Maybe you’re just wrong.
No, its me saying “hey look at these two peer reviewed studies saying you’re wrong” and you saying “but I’ve got an analysis done by a partisan group so its still up in the air”
I believed the same thing you believed before we had studies showing us we were wrong. but the facts changed and so did my opinion. Why didn’t your opinion change with the change in facts?
And if the starting point is 90X, when you introduce the fact that cops in the UK have a much, much smaller chance of being killed by a gun, that 90X seems to maybe be reasonable.
It was when you quoted yourself and triumphantly claimed that Buck was saying this. That’s when I realized this was just about “gotcha” and points-scoring, and too silly to continue. And some of your posts since, with so much wild mischaracterization of my views, has doubly made this clear. Sorry for continuing to drag this out for so long.
Its not gotcha and points scoring when I prove you wrong time and time again. Frankly it wouldn’t be as embarrassing for you if you simply accepted peer reviewed studies as trumping analysis by a partisan organization, this would be less embarrassing for you. Pretty much everyone other than hard core SJW CRTs considers peer reviewed studies to be better than a pro-publica analysis.
To some people, facts can be racist.
That’s strange. I thought it was so dangerous to be a cop, that we have to give them the benefit of the doubt that they were so scared by a black man with a cell phone that they had to shoot him?
Congratulations for your well-declared victory! Declaring your own triumph is an amazing accomplishment. Kudos to you, and best wishes on your future endeavors. I’m sure you will declare much success in the future!
Why are you pro-leprosy?
Maybe I’ll get called by Lord Foul to the land so I can be healed!