I one thing about these “scalar” people is that none of them have ever performed any experiments to demonstrate this principle. They seem to just assume it exists, and then reinterperet other research in such a way to support their “theories”.
I don’t think I understand this. What do door to door stationary and bubble sales estimates have to do with 20s style deathrays?
My 1920’s death ray needs a new battery, I looked on E-bay and only found 1930 death ray replacement batteries…any one have a link to a 1920’s death ray battery replacement site?
ah, maybe the 1920s style death rays are designed to kill salesmen.
Why would you want a “scalar” weapon? Wouldn’t a “vector” weapon be better? That way, you could aim it.
Well it scalar as in scalar potential where the curl of the vector field = 0.
If scalar weapons don’t work, we can try sine, arcsine, cosine, and tangent weapons. I think this board is a great source of tangential power.
Is anyone else picturing Leonard Nimoy reading this thread? “Captain, it appears to be a 1920s-style death ray.”
Damn it Jim! I’m a Doctor not some sort of 1920’s style death ray!
In the interest of a good, honest, GQ answer, I’ve done a bit of research. The best I’ve managed to come up with is a1920s style dead Ray
The below is not really an answer but rather some more question. I saw this thread before lunch and therefore we had this thread for lunch.
It seems that basically what you are doing is creating lightning. So what you will need is a large potential source with the target being basically a ground to attract the “lightning” signal (voltage). But if you fire this weapon on the Earth, there is this huge ground potential right here (it is called the Earth). What is to prevent this huge voltage from diverting right into the ground rather than hitting the target? Therefore the biggest problem to me sounds like aiming this thing would be the biggest problem to implementing this concept.
Tesla was a brillian man, but he also had a sense of humor. Maybe this was just a huge joke on future scientists. I remember the Death Ray being used in a sci-fi movie I saw, just can’t remember which one–dang me and this sieve of a memory.
Maybe someone with more grasp of this concept than me can tell me whether I am right in equating it with “creating lightning” or if I am blowing hot air.
Scalar weapons != creating lightning. The problem is there is no such thing as scalar energy. No website I’ve ever been to regarding scalar-anything has ever given a definition as to what exactly a scalar weapon does/produces/works. They just ramble on about a bunch of abstract concepts referencing other peoples’ work rather than doing any of their own research. On top of all this, there is very little consistency between scalar websites - every site seems to have its own theory.
There’s no scalar-anything related to tesla coils. The devices are well understand and easily described by “standard” physics.
Trigonal Planar the title “scaler” has nothing to do with a type of energy but rather I figure more with the mathmatical way of designing this weapon.
Also, Tesla did ALOT more research on more than just coils. Some of his ideas seemed way out at the time, but were actually possible and we are designing them.
I have been continuing my discussions with some of my workmates (and actually in between doing real work, whoda thunk I could do both). So far the consensus is that this Death Ray could be simplified by looking at it as creating lightning. What if we used microwave signals to create the beam, if we had enough power, that could do some might big roasting of them people in our target as well as eliminating most of their electronics.
Hmmm, the debate continue on this end. I might be back if I get more feedback from them, or I might not cause real work might call.
Tesla’s “Death Rays” and Suppressed E/M Weapons Technology
*1923 Nicola Tesla makes a press release in which he claims he is in frequent contact with ET’s via radio; he also claims he can split the earth like an apple, and destroy 10,000 airplanes, 250 miles away with a new death ray “(Events marked with an asterisk are particularly crucial turning points, and mark periods where the events deviate from what is officially accepted as ‘what really happened’.)”
Actually, it’s a 1930’s death ray:
Peace.
My deepest condolences. I was sorry to hear of the death of Ray.
You just demonstrated my point quite nicely. Everybody seems to have a different definition of what scalar means. I’ve heard it used to mean a particular style of weapon, a type of energy, a type of field, a new way of doing math, etc etc etc. There is a dictionary mathematical definition of scalar, but it is never used this way when talking to the “Scalar Community”. OR if is, its used in an obtuse context.
Please, give me your definition of a “scalar weapon” and explain why the “scalar” preface is necessary and why it warrants such a title.
Y’know, back in the 20s we had these things called “death rays”. They were all the rage and the height of style. Wore 'em on our belts, we did, next to a small yellow onion that we called a ‘wheezer’. Well, everybody had ‘em on account of the hard times. “Don’t be caught without your wheezer”, we’d say, and then we’d all laugh like lunatics. Now, what was I talkin’ about? Oh yeah, we had these stylish death rays back in the 20s that everyone thought was all the rage, but now I’ve forgotten why exactly…
—Grandpa Simpson
I would have to say my avocado green and harvest gold 1970’s style death ray can beat your 1920’s style death ray any day.
Damn you! You stole my post!
Well, it was just a matter of time.
19-dickety-style death rays?
“Death ray, fiddlesticks. Why, it doesn’t even slow them up!”
Must… control… laughter…
Must… not… wake… up… wife…
I have to say, I was impressed by the Lego death rays. A lot of death rays can trace their beginnings to 1920’s style death rays.