Like fashion, I think it depends on the part of the country one is in. When I was living in Austin, I saw a LOT of younger hipster women (early 20s) with full sleeves, chest pieces, rows of stars, and ironic tats (UPC codes, old-school sailor tats, baby blocks spelling out their names, Apple logos, and so on). Women in their late 20s and early 30s have tramp stamps. A bit older, and you’ll see Chinese characters. Women in their 40s, usually those that are a bit more “country”, have shoulder and ankle roses.
In Buffalo, I’m not seeing many sleeves on women; I see a lot more tramp stamps than sleeves on women, but overall far fewer people have tats than in what I saw in Austin.
Maybe they’ll get there in the future, but based on that survey I posted, they’re not there now. About 40 percent of people under 40 have a tattoo, and even if you restrict it to people who have only been legal tattooing age for a few years, it’s still close to that 40 percent number. If they were on the way out, you’d expect to see a significant difference between those age groups. Most people 26-40 don’t have kids who are at the “my parents are lame” age, if they have kids at all.
The way I see it is that tattoos are less of a big deal than ever. They used to have that “I don’t give a fuck” cachet, but now they don’t. They’re something people get if they want to express that they like Indian culture or a band or something. Compared to the tattooed outlaw image of a few decades ago, that’s relatively value-neutral and nonconfrontational, and I think that makes it less likely to inspire some kind of backlash. There are some kinds of tattoos that are still seen that way, but it’s not necessarily the first thing everyone thinks of when they hear that someone has a tattoo.
I am 52. I got my first tattoo before they were “in”. I got my latest last year. In between I’ve gotten ink almost every year and am running out of room. I enjoy them, what can I say.
Interestingly perhaps, I was reading a survey about tattoos from 2003. They were asking people if they had tattoos and where, along with questions like age, gender, and political affiliation.
They also asked the responders about their attitudes regarding tattoos. One of the questions was asked of the people who did not have tattoos. They were given a list of words and asked whether or not they thought it more applicable to people who did not have tattoos than people who did. The clear winner from the list was “rebellious” - 57% of the non-tattooed people asked thought non-tattooed people were more rebellious than tattooed people.
Oh, the star. I see chicks with stars are their wrists, neck, behind the ear, elbow. I knew a guy who got two giant stars, one on each tricep. I asked the significance, all I got was ‘they’re cool, dude.’
If my yoga class is any indication, the trend is alive and well. College age women without tattoos seem to be the exception. Many woman are covered with them.
ETA: elmwood’s description of tattoo type by age is right on the money.
HOW HAVE A TATTOO MAKES ME FEEL
"Please complete the following sentence:"
"Compared to not having a tattoo having a tattoo has made me feel..."
Base: Currently Have a Tattoo
% More Less No Difference
Intelligent % 5 3 93
Sexy % 34 1 65
Spiritual % 20 1 79
Rebellious % 29 1 70
Attractive % 26 4 70
Athletic % 3 1 97
Healthy % 4 * 95
Strong % 16 * 84
ATTITUDES OF THOSE WITHOUT A TATTOO
"Please complete the following sentence:"
"Compared to people without tattoos, I think people with tattoos are..."
Base: All Without Tattoos
% More Less No Difference
Intelligent % * 31 69
Sexy % 8 36 56
Spiritual % 3 29 68
Rebellious % 57 2 41
Attractive % 4 42 54
Athletic % 4 14 82
Healthy % 1 21 78
Strong % 8 8 84
So, as you can see, I had my facts wrong. The non-tattooed people said they thought tattooed people were more rebellious.
I hope so. I’ve never quite been able to wrap my head around the appeal of a tattoo. Maybe it’s because I was such a fan of Popeye when I was a kid; I associate them with grizzled sailors. When I see a beautiful young woman whose perfectly smooth skin is interrupted by a mottled amateur rendering of some sort of winged creature, my response is always “aww.” It’s like someone graffiti-ed the Mona Lisa.
I can see them waning when these formerly-smooth hotties become grizzled and whiskery and smoke corncob pipes, and kids associate tattoos with being old.
You know what’s the difference between a tattooed and an untattooed person ?
A tattooed person will never think of you in a negative way if you’re not tattooed, while an untattooed person might do so if you are.
And a cigarette smoker will not think of you in a negative way if you’re not a smoker, while a non-smoker might do so if you are…
Tatoos are a lot like cigarettes—if you want to damage your body, please don’t make me put up with it .
If you want to mutilate your body, at least show enough maturity to be subtle, and not display it.
It is as obnoxious as ,say, posting on the internet USING ALL CAPITAL LETTERS ALL THE TIME, JUST BECAUSE YOU THINK ITS NEAT AND MATCHES YOUR PERSONALITY.
A visible tatoo is an obnoxious way of calling attention to yourself constantly.SEE LOOK AT ME, I’M GREAT.