Grousser, I did pay attention to the rest of your post. That comment just struck me as being particularly biased.
You’re claiming that ‘society’ finds male bodies less aesthetically pleasing than female bodies. I would like to remind you that society is made up of approximately 50% women, most of whom find men more attractive than women. I don’t think your opinion of what society thinks is accurate, I think it is biased towards what heterosexual men think - an easy mistake to make, because until the recent past heterosexual males have been the most vocal about what they find sexually appealing. I was just trying to remind you that there are a lot of people who don’t hold that opinion.
You say that women who show their breasts in movies do it because they love to - have you thought that maybe some (if not most) of them did it because women are often told that if they don’t show what they’ve got, the part will go to someone else who will? Actresses have tough decisions to make in this regard - young men looking to get into Hollywood are not asked to make these decisions as often. Once an actor or actress has some sway with the studios, then you can tell whether they love to show their bodies to the world. You’ll find that many actresses use this influence to have the nude scene written out, or to hire a body double instead. I think this shows that when they have a choice, most actresses aren’t as keen on waving it all about as you seem to think.
You say that sexual roles need to be taken into account - I think sexual roles are a pile of crap, a carryover from times past, and they certainly aren’t some hard and fast rule that must be adhered to. There is a difference between sexuality and the organs we keep between our legs, and I don’t think we can divide the roles neatly down gender lines. Mens and women’s bodies are different, and Lamia has raised some good points about the difference between nudity for women and men, which I completely agree with. But to say that women should be nude more often than men so that sexual roles can be ‘respected’ just reinforces the idea that women are objects to be put on display, rather than individuals with sexual desires of their own.
You ask if women want to see more or if they want to win - you give only two choices there, and phrase it so that it sounds like some sort of competition, which it isn’t. What about a third option? I think women want to be respected as sexual beings, which means not being exploited (happening less often) as well as having our desires considered (also improving, but more slowly). In terms of Hollywood, this means showing a variety of nudity - male and female, titillating and meaningful, or even no nudity (wacky idea, I know ) depending on the situation. I don’t think we get that variety yet, although moves are being made in that direction and I believe we will reach that point sooner rather than later.
(To change the subject a little bit: Ewan McGregor is doing his share to even up the balance in nudity. )