Are US prostitutes mainly "sex trafficking" victims or not?

That doesn’t take away the fact that trafficking numbers now “seem” inflated for a lot of people. Everyone in this situation(described in your post) is considered to be a victim of trafficking, regardless of the opinion of the person in question. In the UN definition it is explicitly stated that when it comes to “sexual exploitation” it is irrelevant what the “victim” things of the whole thing.

This leads to the situation where many official victims don’t feel like a victim and want to be left alone, which in turn makes it more difficult to help people that want help. In real life there are grey areas as well.

It’s not that easy to have the definition changed btw, so discussing them and how that influences figures and claims in the media is kind of relevant.

In California, free lancing and non-free lancing street walkers, as well as pimps, usually have to pay protection money “or taxes” to the local street gangs.

I don’t see why it couldn’t happen here? We have a high level of crime and corruption in the US. Why is human trafficking occurring here so hard to believe?

I don’t think I’ve ever seen or heard about a bust on a particular prostitute. Almost always it’s either busts on Asian massage parlors/brothels.

Agree with the last sentence but the first part I disagree. Glamorization of pimps and pimping does not happen in the African-American community. It’s more a part of rap culture. I don’t see any prominent black men or women promoting pimping or associating with pimps, but I do see mainstream rap artists promote it and associate with them, even admitting to partaking in the pimp game.

  1. local paper as well as backpage has many, many ads for brothels. You could tell before because they used to have “unblock your number” or they would publish the number with a *82. Now it’s common knowledge apparently that you have to unblock your number so the ads don’t say that anymore. They are so popular that they are referred to as AAMP or AMP (Apartment Asian Massage Parlors and Asian Massage Parlors).
  2. same as above
  3. That’s a good point. It is possible.
  4. That’s possible to, but usually you have to figure out, how did they get here with little to no money and no English speaking skills? If it’s done in a not-quite legal/outright illegal fashion they have to pay back the money it cost to arrive here.

That doesn’t necessarily mean there’s prostitution going on there. Many of those places could be legit. But some do offer “extras,” or even specialize in it.

You can pretty much tell just by the ads.

Well, when their adverts have young Asian women in them wearing lingerie, and then says “Cash Only”, I think it’s a pretty safe bet they’re not legit.

Oh, you’ve seen the ads for these same massage parlors? I thought you meant you just saw a massage parlor and assume it’s a front.

I’m curious to know, if these immigrant women who don’t speak English but are choosing to work in these brothels fronting as massage parlors or apartment massage parlors, what happens if they don’t want to have sex with a particular client? Or they don’t want to perform a certain act? What are their rights regarding mistreatment by their employer? Regular legit business have been known to exploit their employees so couldn’t that be happening here too?

If my boss is paying me $1.50 an hour, I may not feel like a victim, but it’s still a violation of labor law. At the very least, it creates unfair competition for other vendors who choose to follow the law.

We have labor laws in this country that provide workers with specific rights and protections. Running a business that does not comply with those laws is in violation of the law and subject to legal repercussions.

Are you arguing that sex work should be uniquely exempt from labor laws?

nm

I don’t have numbers for massage parlors. But even if there are massage parlors that have prostitutes, you still have not demonstrated that the women who work there are working there involuntarily. Voluntarily engaging in prostitution is not the same thing as being enslaved.

Sure, we can and should enforce laws against debt bondage. I’ve no problem with that. I just don’t know that it’s been established that most Asian massage parlor workers are in debt bondage. Because of all the antics that sex trafficking activitists engage in with their facts and figures, I am EXTREMELY leery of unsupported testimony, and also very leery of whatever surveys and results they come up with. They lie like rugs. Constantly. Nicholas Kristof. Melissa Farley. Somaly Mam. Liars all.

If you have voluntarily accepted a position in a massage parlor knowing that you are going to be having sex with customers, it’s not really rape, is it? Now we may not consider debt bondage valid in the US, but apparently it works in Asia. It’s probably considered a bad deal but definitely an option for getting out of their local poverty.

I’m for legalizing prostitution, because it would make the world safer for prostitutes. I’m OK with going after the people who attempt to enforce debt bondage in the US. I just think we don’t need to characterize all prostitution as sex slavery to do it.