Ok, ok. Jesus H. Christ. Stop the screeching.
I recognized from the early replies to my OP that I should not have said anything about anybody having any kind of bias that appears in any form of any politics or power anywhere at anytime. Although I’m sure I would have been showered with ‘attaboys’ and hand-jobs if I had railed against the Southern U.S. WASP. Consider me duly washed.
I believe that a primary motivation for this fight is to “pre-emptively” protect Israel. Others (including persons on this board) seem to agree or at least not disagree. Take for example this randomly selected (from Yahoo news) quote from an AP report on an anti-war protest in Yemen:
"Protesters pushed ahead, picking up stones and tear gas canisters and hurling them at police. Crowds shouted, “No American and no British Embassy on Yemeni land!,” and, “Death to America! Death to Israel!”
My main question is, I think, more obviously stated in my first reply. No one adressed it, so I guess the attempt to communicate carefully actually obscured the question in “technicolour bullshit”. So, I’ll try it in simple street language unencumbered by more generally accepted rules.
Word up, yaw. If this, you know, cover for Israel, then why don’t , you know, Bush and them, you know, like just come on out wid it one way or the other? And, you know, why somebody over here get all beat up when they, you know, do? And them protestors, you know, wanna leave Israel to the wolves? 'Cause then they,you know, anti-semites just like them dudes over in Yemen. I mean, what up with that … beeutch.
P.S. Along the subject, a photo in Yahoo slide-show of protests in Brazil shows the burning of a U.S. flag with swastikas instead of stars in the blue field. Carnaval of Irony.