I remember that you used to be able to bring 2-bottles of codeine from Canada across the border to the states? Is this still the case?
In this day and age, bringing anything suspicious is a no-no, even if you can cite statutory or case law supporting a right to possession. You DON’T want to arouse the suspicions of customs.
Do you have a prescription for it that is valid in the US?
I thought that you can bring a 90 day supply of a drug that you can legally purchase OTC in the country you are coming from with you upon returning home, even if you don’t have a prescription for it in the USA…
Yeah I don’t have a prescription, but I know you didn’t need them before. Just wondering if anything changed…particularly since I’m leaving back to the states in a couple hours
Customs agents have a lot of discretion. An awful lot. One told someone in the seat in front of me on train from Vancouver, BC to Seattle that no amount of any prescription drug was allowed under any circumstances. So when he asked me if I had any drugs, I just lied. Of course he was wrong, but what do I gain by arguing with him?
I find that difficult to believe, if I do not have my meds I will die. If customs refuses me entry or takes away my prescription meds they will see me in court.
(Bolding mine.) http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/travel/vacation/kbyg/prohibited_restricted.xml#Medication
Codeine formulations are sold without prescription in Canada (or were 20 years ago the last time I got it).
You mean they will see your corpse in court.
mmm
Anecdotal assessment:
The Customs Service is far more advanced than the Transportation Safety Authority (TSA). Back in the day, say the '60’s, almost every bag brought into the USA was subject to at least a brief visual inspection. The amount of international travel expanded so much that it was determined that the procedures were extremely unproductive. The Customs Service concentrated their effort on cooperating with law enforcement and relying on tips. It was a much more efficient and effective way to operate. Currently, you can breeze through customs if you have not been targeted and don’t raise suspicions. The Customs Service doesn’t have the time and inclination to worry about catching people with a bottle of 222’s in their baggage. Other things might raise their suspicions and the 222’s found for other reasons may create a problem but it’s not because that is what they were looking for. There is an element of common sense.
OTOH, the TSA is staffed with a bunch of amateurs. I doubt that they hire anyone with any common sense. Many of the TSA agents are apparently people that have never had any authority and love exercise what little they have been given. It seems that they are trained and forbidden from having common sense. What is going on in airports these days defies common sense. The only hope is that the system will evolve, common sense will win out and air travel can become a lot less painless.
And I don’t want to hear a bunch of shit about how they have to be “random”. Forcing a person on a tight connection (who the system shows to have a long and frequent travel history) to miss their plane and spend the night in the airport because their carry-on bag was 1 1/2 inches too long for the test bracket, even though it fit, and the flight was 1/2 full, is just total BS.
They still are, but it’s a relatively low dosage that’s available OTC. The bottle of Tylenol sitting beside me has 8mg of Codeine phosphate, 300mg of Acetaminophen and 15mg of Caffeine per tablet.
I generally just carry one open bottle and I’ve never had an issue at customs.
He would have to file the appropriate habeas motion.
Unless the law’s been changed, Schedule V drugs, which includes the weaker narcotic preparations, do not require a prescription under Federal law[sup]1[/sup]; all the Controlled Substance Act requires is much the same kind of stocking and record-keeping procedures that apply to pseudoephedrine. The drugs have to kept behind the counter, each sale is to be recorded in a logbook signed by the purchaser, and the customer is allowed to purchase only a limited amount in a given time. The curious upshot of all this is that it’s possible for a substance to be “controlled” in the eyes of Federal law enforcement and at the same time be sold OTC.
[sup]1[/sup]Many if not most states, however, have stricter laws and do require a prescription, and some individual pharmacists may impose their own limitations with regard to people they do not know. Similarly, pharmacy chains may have their own restrictions as well.
Yes, they would see my corpse in court. I assume that, had I insisted on seeing his supervisor, it would all have been OK. But I didn’t want the hassle. The guy was an idiot. But my point was how arbitrary they can be.
Not that it is relevant, none of the drugs was a painkiller or anything like that. I guess I did have some tylenol in my cosmetic kit, but I had forgotten about that until now.