[QUOTE=Bricker]
Parfait. Think parfait.
[/QUOTE]
Or onions.
[QUOTE=Bricker]
Parfait. Think parfait.
[/QUOTE]
Buddy, you are far from parfait.
Do I get to be the German Shepherd? Danke, mein liebe freund.
Shit! We’ve only got one warrant left! Igor, quick…take this one down to Kinkos and run off some copies! Couple thousand for now…
We spend inordinate amounts of time talking about this whole left-right thing, even though for 90% of the content in the SDMB, it just flat out doesn’t matter. Not to mention that there are tons of issues, even in GD, that just don’t have the standard left-right breakdown. The whole issue is overblown, in my opinion.
I was thinking my own posts ran to “no signal, all noise” until the last few posts but compared with the parfait and German Shepherd crowd I’m feeling better about myself.
[QUOTE=ElvisL1ves]
When the views of one segment of the spectrum amount to simple pouting, of which the last 2 posts are examples, is it really so hard to conclude that that part of the spectrum is deficient in facts and reasoning? Should the stubborn maintaining of such a view in that light *not * be scorned?
[/QUOTE]
So pointing out that there is more to talk about besides politics is pouting? Now you’ve done it, you’ve hurt my feelings.
The 2 posts *before * yours. You snuck in while I was typing, you sly bastard. Sorry.
[QUOTE=ElvisL1ves]
The 2 posts *before * yours. You snuck in while I was typing, you sly bastard. Sorry.
[/QUOTE]
Well, OK then. sniffle sniffle.
[QUOTE=Sal Ammoniac]
We spend inordinate amounts of time talking about this whole left-right thing, even though for 90% of the content in the SDMB, it just flat out doesn’t matter. Not to mention that there are tons of issues, even in GD, that just don’t have the standard left-right breakdown. The whole issue is overblown, in my opinion.
[/QUOTE]
I agree with you completely on this. Most of the posters here are to the left of me,a fact which has no impact on most of my experience here.
I feel a little silly now for hurling such invective at Shodan when everyone else is keeping a fairly good humor. Cathartic, though.
[QUOTE=David Simmons]
I’ll take mahattan.
[/QUOTE]
The bronx and staten island, too? Gosh.
[QUOTE=BayleDomon]
I feel a little silly now for hurling such invective at Shodan when everyone else is keeping a fairly good humor. Cathartic, though.
[/QUOTE]
Have you seen Night at the Museum? It makes it easier to keep in good humor when you remember that Shodan has a lot in common with Jedediah. Whenever you read one of his standard posts, just think to yourself “Jedediah’s impotent rage.” You’ll be fine.
[QUOTE=tomndebb]
Hey! At least provide a link to my crimes.
[/QUOTE]
Your post is your [del]cite[/del] crime[sup]TM[/sup]!
GUILTY!!!
This has just got to be mentioned. From one of the google adds. Spot the difference.
[QUOTE=RTA]
I have said for years that moderators should refrain from involving themselves too much in the forums they moderate - just do your job, and your general non-participation is the price that you should pay for your position.
[/QUOTE]
Thing is, though, it’s not their job.
Their job is what they do to pay the rent and put food on the table. This board is an avocation, a hobby, for them. They don’t get paid for moderating, and about the only benefit they get from being moderators is that they can also participate in this board as members. If non-participation were the price to be paid for that position, i don’t anyone could be found to do it.
Now, just because moderators do the job for nothing doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t hold them up to decent standards. I’ve been critical of some moderating decisions before, and no doubt will be again. If someone can’t or won’t do the job fairly, then he or she should be relieved of duty. But to argue that moderators shouldn’t participate as members is asinine.
And to argue, as the OP did, that moderators are somehow responsible for ensuring political balance in each and every debate is the height of idiocy.
[QUOTE=mhendo]
And to argue, as the OP did, that moderators are somehow responsible for ensuring political balance in each and every debate is the height of idiocy.
[/QUOTE]
oh come on. I agree that the OP’s position is stupid, but this is the SDMB Surely we have better examples of the “height of idiocy” than that 
[QUOTE=wring]
oh come on. I agree that the OP’s position is stupid, but this is the SDMB Surely we have better examples of the “height of idiocy” than that
[/QUOTE]
I believe that mhendo was engaging in hyperbole. The OP was strolling through the foothills of idiocy.
Looked more like molehills to me.
[QUOTE=BayleDomon]
No, he only pulls it on weaselly pathetic shits like you. Don’t delude yourself, you whiny little ignoramus. You’re not picked on because you’re a conservative, you’re picked on because you’re dishonest, stupid, and proud of it.
[/QUOTE]
Wow, add BayleDomon to list of users to not piss off.
Jim
[QUOTE=wring]
oh come on. I agree that the OP’s position is stupid, but this is the SDMB Surely we have better examples of the “height of idiocy” than that
[/QUOTE]
Why, did someone Pit Tamerlane again?