Stop it you two! Either that or fight dirty.
I believe my opponent already was - since I hadn’t so much as breathed a word of approval for the diego’s idea of retaliation for being stood up, far less intimated that I’d ever do or have done the like myself. :dubious:
I’d administer a swift but painful Chinese/Indian burn and, if still necessary, give him a wedgie. Then do a victory lap to the standing ovation I would likely receive for my physical prowess.
I thought Chinese burns were outlawed under the Geneva Convention?
I saw this movie too.
Normally I’d thank a man for rising to my defense but not when it’s against a woman; a somewhat confused one.
If you want to be insulting, why not grow a pair and say it clearly? I’m pretty sure veiled accusations receive the same attention, or lack thereof, from the moderators. You’re not quite passive-aggressive, so may as well commit. As you meet people with different life styles and experiences, you will find new and interesting ways to advertise your particular degree of ignorance of man’s diversity and of your dubious character judgement.
Since you seem to rely on films for your most profound life lessons, you may want to check out this website, the most thorough and useful self defense info I’ve found on the web and full of practical advise. While you’re there, feel free to let Marc know how you feel about his experiences … we grew up just a few miles from each other.
Great link SirG. Thanks
I’m not in it for the thanks, and your behaviour as described is … somewhat assholish … I merely remark that it’s relevant to the thread, in a way.
This isn’t a schoolyard brawl, and it’s not a competition for points. I’ll go for any target that presents itself, and I’ll use any advantage that the environment provides. I won’t try to kill my attacker, but he needs to no longer be a threat.
I’m a tiny little out-of-shape girl who is seriously conflict-averse and very out of practice in her chosen (equally conflict-averse) martial art.
All you people who are talking about holding back and just taking it if the crazy back-jumper just wants to “fuck you up” or going easy on him (statistically safe pronoun here) because you don’t know whether he means to kill you or not…
Where the fuck are you learning this instant magical intent-knowledge?
Last time I checked, you didn’t jump someone with no warning and start beating the piss out of them to ask the time or when the next bus was due. If someone attacks me with no provocation (that I am aware of) and no warning, then I’m not holding anything back. It will be whatever and however I can get away, whatever that takes. If he claims afterward in court that he wasn’t intending anything, then fuck that shit - how was ***I ***supposed to know that? I can only respond to what I’m aware of, and in this case, what I’m aware of is that McCrazy is trying to pound me into the dirt for no reason.
Now, I say that knowing that any fight I get into as a woman, especially if I was “just” going to be raped, I’m likely to get my ass killed instead, or at the least beat all to hell, but I’m ok with that. I wouldn’t be able to live with myself if I just lay there and took an attack without giving everything I had to get free.
I’ve been wondering this as well. And it seems to me that an unprovoked violent attack such as I described in the OP has to be interpreted by any reasonable authority as being part of an attempt to maim or kill. Anything else is victim blaming.
To defend myself from a physical assault? Whatever it takes to get away. At the point he traps and hits me, I’m no longer concerned about his safety. How badly injured either of us end up is on him, not me.