I have a really bloody annoying lecturer. She’s the type of feminist that gives all the others a bad name; picture the most sterotypical, over-the-top feminist you can imagine. That’s her.
This is not what i’m pitting.
Now, while she’s a good lecturer (I do learn things in them) she has, I think it’s safe to say, a certain chip on her shoulder about men. She liberally sprinkles a few “The Man oppresses womanhood, and has done for centuries! What are you going to do about it!!” into all her lectures.
This is not what i’m pitting.
Every lecture, however, she has a habit of picking out a guy in the first few rows (although sometimes she’s walked up the hall to talk to “the cowardly men at the back”) and had a go at him. For being male. It’ll be literally things like “So, what do you think about this? What have you personally done? Because if you don’t personally turn up to picket places where women don’t recieve equal pay, you’re part of the problem, you stupid male!” (Yes, she will call people, personally, stupid). All the while the guy keeps sinking into his seat in embarrassment. And she’ll keep going on at this one person for about ten minutes- longer if they try to debate the point; “But I do think men and women are equal” “Of course you do, now i’ve told you they are. Honestly, men just can’t think for themselves”. Evil and grating.
Even her making a general view into a vindictive attack on one guy is not what i’m pitting, annoying and evil though it is.
What am I pitting? Her total logical disconnection.
She’s a lesbian. Fine by me, I have nothing against homosexuals. She’s very active in the field of gay rights ( she runs a local gay rights group ). Again, fine by me. Her main view on this (she gives out leaflets sometimes after lectures, which I’m pretty sure she writes herself. Very professional looking, though.) is that, while lesbians are a minority in society, we should not ignore their wants though there are less of them. Again, this makes sense to me (although it seems a bit strange that she makes out that all gay people have the same needs or views with regards to society).
However, she’s apperently not very tolerant of lesbian mothers. Whether they’ve adopted, or had a child through surrogacy, or a child from a previous relationship, she despises these people. Apperently, by procreating (yes, i’m not sure how adoption counts as procreating) they’re missing the entire point about lesbianism. Such is her belief in the “betrayal” of these beliefs (her words, and again, she seems to think all gay people agree with her) that she boasts that she regularily ignores any letters from them, won’t let them in “her” group, and if she sees a lesbian couple with a child in public she’ll ignore them completely.
So, let me sum up here; She believes that lesbians, while a minority of general society, should still have their rights and wants catered to by the government and by society. Alright.
But she believes that lesbian parents, as a minority of lesbian society, should not have their rights and wants catered to by her group.
Is this the blatant hypocrisy that it seems to be to me?