I had an ex-girlfriend who used to say the most passive aggressive bullshit all the time. She would say all sorts of shit just to get people mad, but then would always have an out.
Your response, "No, which is why I said, “If…” is right up her alley.
Again, why would you possibly say that in response to what I wrote. I wrote nothing which suggests anything remotely close to your allegations, and couching it with a weaselly “No, which is why I said, "If…” is horseshit.
No, it’s not. The fact that you said you didn’t believe the articles that she wasn’t well trained and called for a written policy *suggested *you believe she wasn’t well trained.
So is it a comprehension issue? That despite explicitly stating numerous times that I don’t believe we have enough information to make a decision you are going to assume a meaning which I have stated I don’t know?
and then quote a member of the board concerning training on now to deal with borderline personality disorders, something I was not discussing at all.
I was only discussing glee’s school’s training. Do they have it? Do they not? You seem to be the expert here, tell us. I have repeatedly stated that from these two articles we don’t know this one way or another.
From there you go off on a tirade and make up a completely bullshit misrepresentation of my position]
Again again, I ask in easy-to-understand words.
Show me anywhere I suggested that she was sufficiently trained.
Show me anywhere I suggested that she was an evil person.
This is completely baseless. Just because Trump makes up shit doesn’t mean this is the new norm.
When I call you on your horseshit, you say it’s OK to do this because you used the magic words “if.”
No. I’m not evil incarnate because I don’t read into a – not particularly well reported – article what you want to hear.
I simple say we don’t know everything but since you disagree you are going to create a strawman.
I don’t care whatever strawmen you want to create, but don’t attribute them to me.