Unless there’s a strong image like the Iwo Jima flag raising, the default seems to be a statue of a guy with a gun on a pedestal. When the Vietnam memorial broke with this with a Modern Art black V, they had to come back and add three guys, two with guns (the white guy doesn’t have his).
A bronze Humvee on a pedestal, with bronze passengers?
An eternal flame in the center, with a wreath of hundred dollar bills (metal sculpture) surrounding and reaching in to it. And somewhere, the grim, Penguin like visage of Dick Cheney smiling hidden in the artwork.
Interesting question, which will assuredly come up IRL in a few years.
I think any memorial like this should try to serve two purposes: express something about the everyday experience by the typical soldier (or Marine, etc.), and also something about the particular historical/political/geographic circumstances of that war. The former varies little from war to war, other than the technology of weaponry and the style of haircut, etc.; while the latter is more or less different each time. The latter goal can be met in a subtle way, like how the geometry of the Vietnam Memorial evokes how that war ramped up slowly and kind of dribbled off at the end as well.
So, what is a critical distinction for these wars that can be expressed through large 3D art? I’m not sure. They were triggered by a sudden, very well defined event (never mind the link to Iraq was, ahem, tenuous), but perhaps that has little to do with the wars themselves. **Perhaps something about how the “enemy” was often expressed as a concept or method – actually, as a human emotion: “terror.” ** So, maybe a circular field, with soldier figures cautiously approaching something in the center. The sculpture or object at the center would somehow represent “terror” itself – abstractly. Maybe a mirror?
In other words, be partly inspired by the central motif of the film The Hurt Locker.
Me kicking the shit out of W for squandering years of my life, letting my friends die in squalid hellholes, and refusing to confront Pakistan for their crimes.
Raise your hand if you got this in one guess!
(raises hand)
Like Vietnam, I think this is political charged enough that it would require some caution about messaging. Since it’s really about the people who served, something generic-ish might be fine…
A soldier shielding a child. Although more accurate might be stockbrokers and major shareholders of certain companies rubbing their hands together with glee.
A huge pile of corpses, wearing American, Iraqi and Afghanistan uniforms, mixed with civilians, including children . . . all killed for no reason whatsoever.