Ask Peter Morris if he is a Liar or a Troll or just tell him.

[Fear_Itself]

@Peter Morris

Randi boasts of all the times he has challenged dowsers to “find me a dry spot” and all the times they refused.

I’m willing to take the same test he offered them.

So you *are * a dowser?

[Mangetout]

@Peter Morris

It would help if you actually looked at my website before asking questions.

Yes, I’ve applied.

You can see my application on my website
http://www.proverandiwrong.net/

OK, I see it now. Thanks, it explains everything.

[Dead_Badger]

@Peter Morris

But my detractors in this thread ARE obsessed with him.

Yes indeed, because everyone else here has bizarre webpages with thousands of words of weird rambling about how if you nitpick to death a minor, tangential point of fact you can claim a prize for demonstrating paranormal abilities without, um, demonstrating paranormal abilities. Or something.

[Contrapuntal]

@Peter Morris

But my detractors in this thread ARE obsessed with him. Every time there’s a discussion about dowsing or ESP or anything it’s Rand this, Randi that, Randi the other, Randi is so wonderful, I wanna suck Randi’s dick, Randi does all my thinking for me, Randi says this so that proves its true, etc, etc, etc.

If it wasn’t for them going on about him all the time, I’d have no reason to mention him.

Kindly show just ONE instance of such fawning over Randi in this thread. Just one. One will suffice Peter. After finding that one example and showing it to us, you can stop.

Now, if you were to look for examples of your detractors calling him such names as “prickly” and “a dick,” you would find multiple examples.

Just one Peter. One example of someone having Randi do all their thinking for them.

One.

[Contrapuntal]

@Fear Itself

So you *are * a dowser?

Liar. Only morons and liars would ask such a stupid question. If they could get Randi’s dick out of their mouth long enough.

[Dunderman]

@Peter Morris

I’m not obsessed with Randi, I’d be happy to ignore him altogether.

Then do. It’s be a lot better for you.

[Peter_Morris]

@Contrapuntal

How many times do I have to do it? I know I’ve done it at least three times already.

Alright arsewipe, now you tell me why these are the same thing.

1. You will find water if you drill deep enogh
2. you must prove the spot is dry by drilling.

Now tell me why these statewments are the same, as you evidently believe, you cocksucking moron.

[Peter_Morris]

@Priceguy

Then do. It’s be a lot better for you.

I can ignore Randi. The obsessed motherfuckers who idolise him so much are much more difficult to ignore.

[zuma]

ok, why shouldn’t think guy get bounced out on his ass here. ban him for whatever thing you need… just do it. underground river dousing lava tube nutcases should be out. invent a warning or two.

[Anduril]

@Peter Morris

Alright arsewipe, now you tell me why these are the same thing.

1. You will find water if you drill deep enogh
2. you must prove the spot is dry by drilling.

Now tell me why these statewments are the same, as you evidently believe, you cocksucking moron.

You keep on repeating words like “cocksucking”, “sucking Randi’s cock” with the least provocation. It’s quite telling that the first thought that comes out of your puny mind is cocksucking. There’s nothing wrong with that, mind you.

[Peter_Morris]

@Contrapuntal

Kindly show just ONE instance of such fawning over Randi in this thread. Just one. One will suffice Peter. After finding that one example and showing it to us, you can stop.
.

Look at the **fool Monty ** for example, asserting his belief that Randi doesn’t lie and directing hate against me for providing examples of such.

[Anduril]

And you haven’t answered my questions, Peter. What if Randi acknowledges this factual error (he can do this without making it part of the challenge - read the rules). What then? You’ve proven that he makes factual errors and that he sometimes exaggerates. Whooopeee!!! Your life became so much better a million times. Get a life!

[Peter_Morris]

I’m done here.

go on spew out your abuse and your contempt for logic.

I’m not going to try and point out how stupid you are. I just want the money.

It’s obvious that none of you have understood what the challenge is about, and I’m fed up trying to explain it to you. Go ask a 5 year old child to explain it, he’ll have a better understanding than you, that’s for certain.

[Anduril]

@Peter Morris

Look at the **fool Monty ** for example, asserting his belief that Randi doesn’t lie and directing hate against me for providing examples of such.

Cite?

[Anduril]

@Peter Morris

I’m done here.

go on spew out your abuse and your contempt for logic.

I’m not going to try and point out how stupid you are. I just want the money.

It’s obvious that none of you have understood what the challenge is about, and I’m fed up trying to explain it to you. Go ask a 5 year old child to explain it, he’ll have a better understanding than you, that’s for certain.

Mwahahahaa! You deserve all of it Peter. Good riddance!!! Go ask a 5-year old yourself about what it means like to have a life.

[the_PC_apeman]

@Peter Morris

I can ignore Randi. The obsessed motherfuckers who idolise him so much are much more difficult to ignore.

Look for www.proveeveryoneelsewrong.net coming soon.

[Contrapuntal]

@Peter Morris

Alright arsewipe, now you tell me why these are the same thing.

1. You will find water if you drill deep enogh
2. you must prove the spot is dry by drilling.

Now tell me why these statewments are the same, as you evidently believe, you cocksucking moron.

Liar! I never said those two statements were the same! You fucking mindless liar! Only my detractors would tell such a lie, that is when they are not busy sucking Carl Sagan’s dick and jerking off onto a geological survey! Liar!
It works kinda like this. You cite Randi’s statement, which mentions drilling as the method for determining the location of water, as a “challenge” that you claim eligibilty for. You then suggest a method that does not involve drilling or dowsing, and claim that it is the same test. You do understand that the method for finding a wet area and a dry area must be the same, right? “Wet” and “Dry” are terms that are defined in relation to one another. Not wet things are dry, and no dry things are wet. They are inextricably linked.

Randi has essentially stated that very few dry spots exist, and he can prove it by drilling. For you to offer an alternative method of proof may or may not be an interesting intellectual exercise (I’m kinda leaning towards ‘may not’,) but one thing it is not is a response to whatever challenge you imagine Randi extended toward whomever.

If you assert that you are eligible for the same challenge, all things must be the same. Without drilling, it is a different challenge.

[FinnAgain]

Bye bye crazy-lying-troll.

[Left_Hand_of_Dorkness]

From Randi’s website:

4.2. What should I do before I apply?

Depending on the nature of your claim, this could be a grueling, stress-filled process. Although the JREF wants you to have everything reasonable in proving your claim, they will not suffer months of endless negotiations with an applicant who seems unwilling to accept the methods of rational inquiry. Remember, it’s not a contest; it’s a challenge. This isn’t going to be like taking a test. This is going to be like going to court. The onus of PROOF lies entirely with you, so you must be prepared to present it properly. After all, there’s a million bucks at stake.

Make sure you are healthy. Get both a physical and mental check-up. Many people who claim to have paranormal powers are, sadly, suffering from an advanced state of delusion. That isn’t to say that you are, but it’s a hypothesis that may be raised during the application process. So, be prepared for this in advance, especially if your claim is extremely remote by reasonable standards.

This next step is very important, because it will be the first big hurdle you will face:

*Tell your physician and/or psychiatrist that you have a paranormal ability and that you plan on demonstrating your paranormal ability in front of a team of observers, and consider heeding his/her advice. *

The reason that this is a big hurdle is this: you should trust your physician/psychiatrist; they’re on your side, after all. If you cannot convince them that applying for the Challenge is a good idea, you won’t stand a chance against people you don’t trust and who are not on your side.

Emphasis in original.

Peter, have you followed the process for applying? Have you talked to your physician and/or psychiatrist?

What about the next stage:

After you are sure you are healthy and you have told your doctors about your intentions, make sure you can actually do the thing you will be claiming you can do in the application. If you know your ability is based on a trick or deception, stop right here and don’t apply. Don’t lie to yourself.

If you are sure you are not lying to yourself, find someone you know who is a reasonable, scientific sort and talk to him about your ability. Ask him to be as unfriendly and skeptical as possible. Then, demonstrate your proposed claim to him. This is the second big hurdle. If you can convince a brutally honest friend that you can do something paranormal, then keep going. Otherwise, stop; you will have no chance convincing the JREF’s investigators.

I know you have talked to scientists about the existence of underground rivers. Have you presented any of them with the rules of the challenge and your proposed application and asked them to evaluate whether your application has a snowball’s chance in hell of success?

If not, why not?

Daniel

[Smeghead]

My brain hurts.

When I went to bed last night, I never would have guessed that I would wake up in the morning and slog through four pages of vitriolic ranting about dowsing. This place is odd.