[QUOTE=delphica]
Are rates lower for non-profits? Red Cross, stuff like that.
Do any of the designated market areas have quirks that are known in the industry – like such and such would never work in Boise, or this other thing is a sure hit in Boston?
Do the big companies ever just give up on a particular market, for either positive or negative reasons? Does Coke even need to advertise in Atlanta? Does Pepsi even bother?
Was there ever a commercial or campaign that surprised you – maybe you thought it was eh, but then it turned out to be hugely popular?
TV/kitsch nostalgia is so popular these days, I’ve wondered why companies don’t run classic retro ads. I’d figure if nothing else, it would be less expensive than producing a new commercial. Is there a reason this doesn’t happen, or am I just out of touch with what makes those crazy kids buy products these days?
[/QUOTE]
Stations will air free spots for non-profits, or PSA’s as they’re called. This is pretty common.
We have some big clients at our agency and we recently cancelled all spending in a certain midwest market because they were constantly bumping our spots. The client decided that the money would be better spent in a market that would actually run our spots.
Coke doesn’t need to advertise in Atlanta, I’m positive. I think they mostly advertise on a national level though, so it’s a bit moot. No reason to market directly to individual markets when your product is so ubiquitous.
Ahh.. and what about when a station bumps our spots, or pre-emptions as they’re called. Obviously, this isn’t cool - but it happens every single day.
If a station misses our spot for any reason. Whether it’s a technical difficulty, or maybe they just found someone to pay more for the time - they must try and give us a “Makegood” in a similar program that will deliver a similar rating. Half of my day is spent chasing makegoods.