In another thread someone was asking about getting his money back for a sick puppy that he got from a disreputable Craigslist seller. The discussion devolved into an argument about supporting disreputable sources of pets (along with some support for the poor sick pup). It seemed like an interesting topic: when does buying/adopting a pet support the “source/industry”? I have some experience in a very controversial area of dog adoption, so this came up in the thread:
Starting with my comment about greyhound adoption both supporting and not supporting the perpetuation of the racing industry:
It does support the industry because the race owners can easily get rid of their unwanted dogs and buy/breed new ones. However unlike 10 - 15 years ago when unwanted hounds were destroyed by the thousands every year because they were not seen as being “pet-worthy” we now have a large, efficient adoption network. Unwanted dogs are now happily handed over to the adoption network. The adoption network is a magical thing that’s grown up from a deep love of the breed and is almost entirely volunteer and donation-based. We have something we call a “GUR” which stands for Greyhound Underground Railroad. It’s a volunteer/donation-operated transportation network where dogs are moved from the tracks (around the gulf states) to adoption groups all over the country and Canada.
Many dogs are injured when racing, and instead of euthanizing them as was the former practice, the adoption network has stepped up to saving them also. Nobody wants to adopt an animal with broken bones, so many adoption groups donate money to pay for surgery, followup medical care and fostering during rehabilitation in order for the dog to then be adopted. Rephrased, they send money for vet care of dogs that are not yet adopted and won’t be adopted until they’re recovered. As a result of this heroic practice, most of those injured dogs actually are now adopted!
On the other side of the coin, adopting a retired racer does not support the industry because the dog racing industry is in rapid decline for a list of other reasons. There’s no longer the popular interest in dog racing and people are spending their money instead in casinos (slot machines and card games). Animal welfare organizations do pound on the industry regularly still, which results in the public having a negative opinion of racing folks. (Might be worth a separate post but they have earned that negative public opinion and although their practices are much, much better than they used to be, the racing industry is so defensive that they are now their own worst enemy. Nobody in the racing industry seems to understand the value of public relations, so they end up looking like complete assholes. Having met some kennel workers and farm owners, I think that’s a shame because there are some really good people in the industry who love the dogs and do maintain their best interest.)
At any rate, my point is that adopting a greyhound doesn’t support the industry because it’s rapidly failing for other business reasons anyway.
In another post (I need to run for a bit and come back later), I can talk about the amazing way greyhounds are raised, which is nothing at all like puppy mills and most people have no idea.
All questions are welcome as well!