[QUOTE=RTA]
Of the exhibitions that are shown, what is the ratio of items that come from that in-house collection only{?}
[/quote]
99% of them. On occasion, we’ll run a special theme exhibit and ask for loans from the community if or collection is sparse in that area. As an example, last year we had a all-school “Class of 1946” reunion in town. We decided to do an exhibit, but as my curator said, it would have been easier to do an exhibit on 1846. (People never think we’ll be interested in “modern” items, so they don’t think to donate them.
We really don’t like to borrow. It’s stressful-- we have to worry about getting all of the items back to their owners and we have to be even more careful than usual. If we scratched an item of our own, it would be a tragedy, but God help us if we dented someone’s football trophy.
Hardly ever from other museums.
That happens frequently.
Last week, another museum sent us a catalogue of an exhibit they’re doing that prominently features one of our pieces. We all crowded around the catalogue, exclaiming and squealing. It was like seeing one of your kids in a magazine or something.
Nothing like the King Tut exhibit that’s going on at the Field Museum right now. Whenever we have shows featuring other institutions’ pieces, it’s usually a very limited one-day-only event in which the employees of that place are in charge of their own stuff.
It’s rare, and it’s usually something like a quilt exhibit or some sort of demonstration.
I’m a bit fuzzy on this, so I can’t answer it fully. I know pieces are insured when they’re loaned out, but there’s no way we could carry loss insurance on every thing in the museum. We could never afford the premiums, and in a way, it’s kind of pointless. We could never replace most of those items, anyway. (How do you replace something that’s one-of-a-kind or something which is made valuable by its provenance?)
That’s almost impossible to answer. There are so many items which are literally priceless that I couldn’t even hazzard a guess.