It smacks a bit too much of the old ‘acting white’ or ‘not black enough’ accusations, though I’ve only seen her own Colbert, which I know is not exactly a great platform for people who want to get a point across.
As far as redefining racism in America, if Obama does win, one positive is that he follows Bush and therefore couldn’t possibly be as terrible as the current administration. Therefore, it’s less likely we’d see a row over how awful the first black president was.
Well, it would be one helluva trick to be considered an awful president coming after Bush.
It smacks a bit too much of the old ‘acting white’ or ‘not black enough’ accusations, though I’ve only seen her own Colbert, which I know is not exactly a great platform for people who want to get a point across.
From what I gathered from reading her article in the Salon, her argument has little to do with him “acting white”, but rather his roots.
From Salon :
Black," in our political and social reality, means those descended from West African slaves. Voluntary immigrants of African descent (even those descended from West Indian slaves) are just that, voluntary immigrants of African descent with markedly different outlooks on the role of race in their lives and in politics. **At a minimum, it can’t be assumed that a Nigerian cabdriver and a third-generation Harlemite have more in common than the fact a cop won’t bother to make the distinction. They’re both “black” as a matter of skin color and DNA, but only the Harlemite, for better or worse, is politically and culturally black, as we use the term. **
The whole Obama-isn’t-black-enough meme was discussed and pitted a while ago in this thread . You may agree or disagree with Dickerson’s opinion on Obama’s “blackness” (as she defines it), but her argument isn’t racist.