I was watching this movie (again) earlier this week. It’s one of my favorite movies of all time, but I had a thought at the end of it that I’d never thought about before:
In the new 1985, where George and Lorainne are happy, etc, did Lorainne ever have to explain to George why their son looks just like this guy that they knew in high school? And why he’s even named after him?
I don’t think that she’d have to. He wasn’t born until 13 years after they met (approximately), and he certainly didn’t look like a seventeen year old when he was. By the time that he looked like he did when he was seventeen, Lorainne and George would’ve regarded his looks as those of their son, not those of “that guy we knew for a week back in high school.”
Well, that part is easily explained. One or the other of them, Lorraine I think, remarks that “Marty” is a nice name back in 1955.
As to the looks, you’re talking about a kid they knew for a week 30 years ago. Chances are, they don’t have all that clear a recollection of what “Calvin” looked like.
What about the book? It has Marty in the radiation suit because when you see a figgin’ alien visit you in the night, you kinda remember what that looks like. Some random guy for a week? Not so much. And yes, Marty was essentilly names Marty because Marty went back to meet his parents…after they already named him Marty before meeting Martry…damn, paradoxes are confusing!
No, he didn’t. She called him Calvin the whole time.
When he was leaving the dance, and told “Calvin” that George McFly was taking her home, he said something about “if you ever have a kid named ‘Marty’ who sets the living room rug on fire, go easy on him.”
She then comments that “Marty” is a nice name.
I was always surprised that when he got back to the future, the older son wasn’t now named Marty.
I had a similar doubt in BTF-III. Marty goes back to 1885 and meets his earlier ancestors, the first McFlys to settle in America. His male ancestor resembles him, and his female ancestor resembles his mother. Which would allow for the case of Baines lineage… but the family is McFly, which would imply paternal lineage.
If you want some paradoxes (paradoxi?) that will keep you thinking, read “By His Bootstraps” by RAH. Same theme in “All You Zombies” but not as much fun.
OTOH, though, I think all the paradoxi are explained by Brown’s theory about diverging time lines. I have to admit, even as a kid, the moment in II when he started talking about that my first reaction was “Well, then nothing they’re doing -really- makes any difference, it just spawns another time line.”
You’re right, ArrrMatey. Marty didn’t really change anything, he just shunted himself into a different timeline according to the “many worlds” theory. The happy, well-adjusted Marty who belonged in the timeline our Marty was in by the end of the series, got pushed off into some other place. Or, he was off at the mall, and the two Martys will meet sometime after the last scene of the third movie.
Sorry to keep flogging this particular horse, but . . . he doesn’t say anything in this line about “a kid named Marty.” I just cued the tape up to this scene, and he says (very close paraphrase), “If you guys ever have kids . . . [Lorraine blushes] and one of them, when he’s eight years old, accidentally sets fire to the living room rug, go easy on him.”