Bands which were better in their earlier and less successful incarnations

First of all, I’d place The Korgis in this category.

They had success in the '80s (more in the U.K. than the U.S. as far as I can tell) with a brand of pop-rock vocal harmonizing that included a few songs I liked but were overall too sucrose-infused for my taste. I much preferred the progressive rock group David and Warren sprang from, Stackridge (which had a brief minor vogue in the early '70s with albums like “Pinafore Days” and "Extravaganza). The issue got a bit confused in later years what with various demises/reincarnations of The Korgis and revival(s) of Stackridge, to the point where some version or other apparently is still touring.

Then there’s Eurythmics, whose members (Annie Lennox and David Stewart) were originally in a late '70s spacy power-pop group called The Tourists, whose music I enjoyed far more than that of Eurythmics, who always struck me as a modern but mediocre updating of Sonny and Cher (or to be even crueler, The Captain and Tennille).

Feel free to agree/disagree/groan in disgust/pick your own.

I’ve always much preferred the Green/Kirwan/Spencer Fleetwood Mac over everything that followed. I’m not very knowledgeable about their middle period, though I heard some albums and liked them, but the Nicks/Buckingham Mac don’t do much for me. That was a very different beast.

Not a band but Leo Sayers first two albums are a delight before he went adult contemporary.

Blood, Sweat and Tears. The original Al Kooper version put out a great album of blues-based rock that the David Clayton- Thomas group couldn’t match.

Renaissance. The first incarnation (with a couple of ex Yardbirds) was a rocking meld of rock and baroque classical with a terrific piano player in John Hawken. By the time of their second album, everyone had left and the music lost the hard edge.

i could fill up a whole thread about the argument “which was better joy division or new order?” considering fans have been arguing about it it for 30 years…

Can I say the Brian Jones era Stones?

As I recall, the first two Queen albums were more straight ahead hard rock and more to my taste than later on.

Chicago…duhhh…

Heart…

The Steve Miller Band. Their first five albums are classic, with great songs like “Space Cowboy,” “Living in the USA,” and “Your Saving Grace.” After a couple of flops, Miller emerged with The Joker and one lousy top-40 hit after another.

Genesis, of course.

I prefer the Birthday Party to The Bad Seeds. Not by much, mind you, but I do.

I also greatly prefer Vince Clarke-era Depeche Mode

That is the number 1 answer.
Journey with Gregg Rolie.

Iron Maiden’s first two albums

That’s a tough call.

Joy Division had the more interesting vision and the more ambitious aesthetics. New Order had the catchiest songs, and more consistency.

Is New Order actually the more successful band, though? I’m guessing they’ve had more No. 1s, but where’s their biopic, huh?

Here?

Pink Floyd with Syd Barrett? Awesome.

Pink Floyd after Syd Barrett left? No thanks.

The exact opposite for me.

REM. For me Out of Time and Automatic for the People are okay, what went before was a lot more interesting and what went after mostly zzzzzz.

I didn’t expect anyone to mention Journey. Yeah, pre Steve Perry Journey, when they were essentially an offshoot of Santana, was a much better band than the 80s version.