Sqweels, here’s a little geography lesson for you.
The southern part of the United States abuts this country called Mexico.
In Mexico, there are a large number of people who just love their fireworks.
Like the indiana/illinois thing, if you don’t have ready availability of fireworks in one place, people will get them where they’re readily available. Like Mexico. Then they’ll return to the US where they’ll continue to engage in fireworks usage, much, perhaps, to your surprise but not anyone elses.
Let me further clear something up for you, something I posted much earlier in this thread.
If something people want (and it is obvious that people want fireworks, else why do they enjoy such enormous sales volume) becomes illegal, there will be people who still want them, and there will be people willing to take the risk to obtain them illegally and make a profit therefrom.
One can even reasonably draw the logical conclusion that the people who are most likely to be willing to break the law to lay their hands on an illegal substance are the people you least wanted to have them anyway. Hence, banning the substance has only had the effect of taking it out of the hands of people unwilling to perform an illegal act, and does nothing to stop the people who are willing to do so.
Your argument seems to be “fireworks are not like drugs” Yippie kiy yay, you have just passed the sesame street level. One of these things is indeed NOT like then others. Given the present level of consumption of fireworks across the US, tell me that there aren’t people as addicted to the resounding “boom” as they are to a joint after lunch, a martini after dinner, or a handjob in an alley while waiting for the bus. Can you? no.
Name an illegal substance which has not found its way back into the US. You can’t. You never will be able to. The closest thing in existance? R12. R12 was banned. You can still get it if you’re determined, but the fact is, many if not most cars AC units will now run if retrofitted to R134. Readily and easily available R134. The only way to effectively remove a substance from common use is to replace it with a substance just as satisfactory.
As for throwing rocks at the windshields of cars- Do you actually read the threads before you post to them? or just hunt out things you think you can focus your high powered (drop to zero indeed!) logic on and ignore the rest of the post?
b.