Bare-bottom bride sues dress designer

I don’t go to the right weddings.

What, no pics?!

The official photographer probably forgot to pack the wide-angle lens.

It wasn’t the designer’s fault, the Universe was smacking her with a clue-by-four.

It would seem that the dress found grounds for objection.

This gives new meaning to the term “honey moon.”

Her objection was that she found the dress on the ground.

My new favorite phrase! I can’t wait to use it on the air.

In a situation like that, you can hem and haw and stand on ceremony, or you can try to relax, let your hair down and take things in stride. (One’s choice is, like the failed gown in question, revealing.) Although it sounds like she’s now set in her bias against the designer and is prepared to needle him with cutting remarks and barbed criticisms in the press.
I wonder, though, if the bride wasn’t repeatedly treading on her gown or train, precipitating the wardrobe malfunction?

Mom: “Always wear clean underwear in case you’re in an accident or in case your dress falls apart on the altar.”

And ten minutes later it went up on YouTube.

Garsh, looks like the bodice and skirt weren’t the only things to part company.

On the one hand, I can see demanding some kind of compensation from the dressmaker; but to call it the worst day of her life? I did note, however, that nowhere does the article actually say the mishap exposed the bride’s BARE bottom. Maybe she just had skimpy undies on, which certainly would be embarrassing enough. But one wonders why hubby didn’t even stick around two years – or why she gave him the boot so soon.

My thinking exactly.

Is it just me or do underwear reveal about as much as a bikini? I mean, supposing she was wearing panties, how much different would it be than a walk on the beach?

This juror wants pictures! :smiley:

It probably exposed her granny panties, and she lost all claim to “sexy” with her intended right there!

Link???