Barricading of the WWII Memorial

I’m very much NOT looking for a debate on this. What I’d like to know is:

Did the president or his administration order the barricading of the WWII memorial specifically, while leaving other similar memorials un-barricaded? If so, was there any specific rationale given?

Sadly, the vast majority of the links I can find on the topic are to staunchly right-wing sites and blogs (Daily Caller, Hot Air, etc.), and so I’m disinclined to trust their objectivity. But supposedly-neutral fact-check sites like Politifact and Factcheck haven’t weighed in, as far as I can see.

My sense is that such places were barricaded, because a) due to the shutdown, they couldn’t be staffed as normal, and b) they wanted to discourage at least a surface level of possible vandalism while the places were closed, and the barricades were a relatively inexpensive way of doing that.

Cites from objective sources would be ideal!

Thanks much.

This is covered in the Great Debates forum of this BBS. All the parks were shut down, because they are non-essential government functions. They were closed for the protection of the park facilities, of the sights and attractions, and also for the protection of visitors.