But saying the first baseman is now the pitcher isn’t substituting, it’s just changing a position. If you’re subsituting, someone is leaving and someone is coming in.
And in your scenario, you are taking someone out and replacing him with someone who is already in the game.
Zev you are destroying the universe by creating two Giambis in your scenario. Sort of a Giambi and a Giambi prime if you will.
I brought up rule 3.08 because it gives a guideline on what consitutes changing pitchers.
Yeah, I know. I conceed that my hypothetical situation wouldn’t fly. However, (going back to the original question), I’m not so sure that the DH role terminates. I still tend to favor Irving falling out of the lineup (since he’s now the pitcher) and King batting in the 9 spot.
Maybe I’m overlooking something as I’m not really a baseball nut, but couldn’t the Yankees just put in another guy to pitch? Don’t knnow any rules about substitutions, but this makes sense. Not that the umpires would let it happen, of course.
I don’t really know the rules very well but that is the part that jumped out at me in your scenerio. The rules specifically state that a double switch is taking place at the same time. But can a substitution and a player movement take place at the exact same time(or a switch and a half as beeblebrox called it)?
Because unless the whole thing can happen simultaneously wouldn’t jones be the catcher for a moment? which would violate the ‘dh goes away if the pitcher is substituted defensively’ part?
First comment: There are two Giambis – the Yankees only got one. Jeremy’s still in Oakland (although Chaim may have some comments about the Royals having lost him ;))
Second comment: “Pitch to one batter” refers to issuing one pitch to the batter – it’s not at all uncommon for a pitcher to be relieved during an at-bat. So (Jason) Giambi can throw one pitch-out ball and Soriano (or maybe Rivera) be brought in to relieve him.
I discussed your situation with an umpire. Surprisngly, he didn’t laugh at me. He took it under consideration and told me that it won’t fly.
The principal stumbling block is that the umpires expect a pinch hitter to be someone off of the bench. That’s not explicitly stated in the rules, but that’s the practice that umpires hold to.
He also said that anyone trying such a gambit would be quickly tossed from the game because umpires don’t like these sort of shenanigans.
I think it would fall under the same category of trying to have a pitcher intentionally walk somebody by having him put his hand to his mouth four times.
After the second time a pitcher did that, an umpire would likely toss that pitcher out of the game and his manager as well.
Thanks for the help. However, this one situation is different because the rules explicitly state that the game pitcher can bat for the DH. If he tried to disallow that (in a normal situation, not in the case my warped brain made up) the manager should (rightly) play the game under protest.
Zev Steinhardt