Is there any rhyme or reason to the naming convention used in identifying battery sizes? Common batteries found in grocery stores include: AA AAA, C, D, and 9 volt sizes. What happened to B? And what makes the letter ‘A’ so special it gets several batteries named in its honor?
That partially explains it, but still don’t understand ANSI’s rationale for designating double and triple A’s, as opposed to assigning each its own letter. In other words, why no double or triple C’s for example? ANSI undoubtedly had a rational basis for setting it up the way they did nearly a century ago, but whatever guiding principle they used is not obvious to this casual observer.
Originally there were no AA or AAA, etc. It was just A, B, C, D, E, etc. generally going up in size.
As electronics got smaller, they needed smaller batteries. What’s smaller than A? There’s no letter before A, so how about AA? What’s smaller than AA? Um, how about AAA? That’s how the letter doubling got started. B batteries fell out of common use. F batteries stuck around for a while, and used to be common inside lantern batteries (basically four F cells in a square-ish box). These days many lantern batteries use smaller C or D batteries and spacers (cheap bastards).
If you need a smaller battery than a D, you just use a C, so there’s no need for new double-letter batteries for the larger sizes.
The prevalence/popularity of smaller batteries argues for ‘recalibrating’ the whole battery nomenclature system IMHO, but perhaps this is a QWERTY or US-metric type phenomenon, where changing battery nomenclature at this point would be likely to confuse and anger consumers .
People sometimes claim that a 9V battery contains six of these. Actually, it contains six “LR61” cells which are just slightly smaller, and will actually fit in most places where you want an AAAA.
You can use the IEC nomenclature if it makes you feel better. Good luck convincing other folks to use it though. People are gonna look at you funny if you ask for an LR6 battery instead of a AA.
They have more capacity, so they will last longer in a similar application. It’s like having a car with a 5 gallon gas tank vs one with a 10 gallon tank. Same performance characteristics (assuming the same battery chemistry) but more capacity.
The one I always chuckle about is the 1/2 AA battery. It’s literally a AA battery that’s only half as long. Apple used to use them as PRAM batteries in their older Mac computers like the original iMac. They were equivalent to the CR2032 batteries you see on most PC motherboards powering a CMOS.
So you go from A, to AA, to 1/2 AA. I’d love to see a Micro 1/2 AA someday.
Just look at the volume difference.
In olden times, when NiCd batteries were all the rage, an AA battery was something like 600mAh, and a D-cell was 8,000mAh. The problem was, they were so expensive that people wouldn’t pay for the extra capacity, so they started to put c-cells in a D package, which was much cheaper, but also much lower capacity.