Thanks, ol’ buddy. You know what I’m talking about.
From a Youtube thread:
Oh, none taken! See you next year!
Da Faq?
You are obviously a person of sterling character and judgement, with excellent taste and a knack for understanding where best to place your loyalties. You are welcome at any FSU gathering or game-watching, anywhere, anytime;; just tell them I said you were cool, do the tomahawk chop and the chant, and they’ll make you feel right at home.
Just in case you want to know, the North is not nearly as obsessed with the South as the South is obsessed with thinking the North is obsessed with the South. If y’all would just stop sending so many morons to Congress we wouldn’t need to think about you much at all.
…until an SEC team beats the bejeezus out of some northern team, and then just watch the “ignorant hicks!” sour-grapes comments fly.
Part of it, of course, is the spirit of rebellion. Not Rebellion, but rebellion. I can’t count the number of times I’ve heard someone say that it’s somehow unacceptable for us to root for someone who is not, strictly speaking, our own home team. It bewilders and confuses those who don’t understand the factors I talked about upthread.
Here’s a secret: we like that. We enjoy your bewilderment. It’s refreshing. The nature of our fandom is our own. You can’t have it, and you can’t dictate it.
In short, and I do not mean this as a personal insult, but every time I hear someone make fun of us, as SEC fans, for cheering for a team we would normally loathe, there’s a small, resentful part of me that silently answers, “Because fuck you, that’s why.”
As for the political part of your rant, uh, I thought we were talking about football here.
Unfortunately, Penn State is not bowl eligible.
Neither College Station, TX nor Columbia MO are “in the Southeast”. The SEC is as expansive and money driven as any other college sports conference.
What’s absurd about South Florida being in the Big East?
They were added in 2012, well after the SEC’s culture was in place. As Texas (and surely Missouri, I assume) has its own distinct non-Southern culture, the additions of A&M and Missouri may well diminish the conference pride we have today. Time will tell. At the very least, there’s a geographical coherence that’s been preserved.
Call me old-fashioned, but I like my conferences to be geographically close-knit, preferably aligning with a distinct region of the country.
Not anymore, no. And it’ll probably be even less true after the conference expands again.
Relative to other conferences, there is. Of the 11 SEC states, 10 border two other SEC states (South Carolina being the exception, and it borders one).
Possibly, depends on who gets added.
Well said, Ogre.
Until this point you hadn’t mentioned the fact that your praise was relative. You just said the SEC was geographically logical, which it isn’t.
No, I didn’t. But ironically in arguing against that perceived offense you’re about to invoke the same kind of regional pride that always comes up in these discussions.
I don’t care. My entire point is that rooting for a conference (or a vaguely defined geographic area) is stupid.
I never asked you to beg, and I don’t care because I’m not rooting for a football conference or a region of the country. I don’t care what general area the top BCS team plays in.
And I still don’t care.
Think whatever you like. It won’t stop the chants for one second. It will just make them louder.
I really don’t see this as a positive. Instead of dealing with actual issues, like improving education, decreasing obesity, and being more tolerant, too many Southern’s appear to say: “Yep. But we sure did kick yo’ ass in football! Uh Huh Uh Huh!”
Congrats, you won a football game. Woo fucking hoo! Sure Alabama consistently ranks at the bottom in the nation in poverty rates, obesity, education, infant mortality, internet access, divorce, and quality of life, but dadgummit we win football games!!!
I didn’t think my opinion would stop anybody from chanting. Of course it won’t make anyone louder either.
How can a conversation about the unique culture of an athletic conference not be relative to other conferences? In fact my first post on the matter read:
Emphasis added.
The conference pride in question could be affected by the additions of Texas A&M and Missouri. We’ll have to see.
It’s still the most geographically logical conference, and this is relevant due to the cultural roots that underlay SEC pride being those of the region the SEC covers.
We’re discussing the geography issue. Your first post about that went this way:
You’ve now admitted that’s not true- because it isn’t. I’ll concede that the SEC is probably more geographically coherent compared to the other FBS conferences. But that’s a much, much more limited statement than ‘the SEC represents a distinct region with no geographical absurdities’ and there’s so little regional coherence in the conferences at this point that it’s hardly praise. And when the SEC expands to 16 teams it’ll probably be as absurd as the other conferences.
It’s not an either/or issue. See you next year!
Roll Tide!