As someone who usually makes quite intelligent posts, it saddens me that you have gone so low as to post the assinine, baseless tripe that you have in this thread. I respect your views; you have the right to have them (even if they are founded on outdated and childish premises) but people who make the kind of rediculous arguments you do in order to justify their views piss me off to no extent. Let’s get started.
So fucking what? This is the stupidist justification for a political stance I’ve seen in a long, long time. People have the right to do whatever the hell they want in the privacy of their own home or business so long as they are not infringing upon the rights of others. This third grade concept seems to be completely lost on you. But this isn’t nearly the worst of it.
I’m sorry, but this type of argument is not only completely irrelevent to what is being discussed (sex acts in night club s) it is petty and juvenile. Comparing the acts of consenting adults in a private institution to crackwhores is offensive. This type logical leaping is a sign of someone making a baseless argument without putting a seconds worth of thought into it.
Your argument sucks. Why not just say, “If you dont like crack houses, just stay away from them. They are not bothering you! If you have such a problem with a whore house, do not go to them!”
Again you are comparing two totally unrelated topics. Things that are dangerous and a threat to the community (crackhouses) are illegal for a reason. There is NO REASON why a sex act in a private business should be illegal.
Ignoring ilegal activity is not the solution. Tampa Police raid these Asian massage parlors here all the time. Why? Because the ladies are having sex with the clients. This is ilegal. No, it will not cause the destruction of man but it is ilegal. Why should we just ignore it with the excuse, “Well people who do not agree with it should just not go there.”
Obviously, you have no aspirations concerning the future of your society. If something is illegal that shouldn’t be (i.e., there is no moral basis for why people should not be allowed to do it) that law should be changed. It’s a weak and stupid position to defend a law “because it’s the law.” YOU HAVE EVEN ADMITTED that the law served no real purpose! YOU HAVE EVEN ADMITTED that there is no moral justification for the law! What would happen if Ghandi, MLK Jr., and Rosa Parks obeyed the law “just because it’s the law?” What would have happend if Martin Luther had defended the religious views of his institution just because “those are the views?”
This level of apathy sickens and saddens me. Jesus H. Christ, man, you admit that a law is pointless, and then defend it! Please, please, please put some fucking thought in before you make yourself look like a complete idiot.
Final Jerry-Springer-esque thoughts: I got pissed off not because you hold views different than my own. I got pissed off because the sheer amount of stupidity expressed in your arguments for those views is OFFENSIVE. The types of baseless leaps you make between consentual sex and criminal activity are the same type of argument made by people who KNOW they have no acceptable premise from which to start.
Here endeth the rant.