Beech Starships headed for the boneyard

AOPA ePilot is reporting:

Too bad. The Starship is a nice-looking aircraft. IIRC, it suffered from weight-gain during its development and never reached its expected potential. I think that people with the wherewithal to buy one probably opted for jets instead of the turboprop.

Sure, it was expensive and didn’t perform better than other aircraft in its class; but I applaud Raytheon for making the effort. With Cessna building airplanes that were designed in the 1950s, Piper’s offerings dating from the 1960s, and engine designs that have their roots in the 1930s, it was refreshing to see such a “radical” design.

Hi Johnny!

Major Hijack here: What’s your best guess on the value of a 1950 CJ3A with 70’s 304 V8 and running gear?

When I lived in Chicago, a tool & die company there had one at Palwaukee Airport. The design would just take your breath away.

A picture of one:
http://brunton.cottagesoft.com/starship.gif

Beautiful airplane. I wonder how cheap I could get one, it would make a great treehouse for my nieces (I could never afford to fly it).

I really wish there were a little more innovation in GA aircraft designs. I know certification is expensive, but I think the consumers would reward it. Part of the reason the Starship was so heavy is that the FAA didn’t have much experience with composite aircraft, and it had to be way overbuilt.

I know the “new design” aspect had a lot do to with my employer spending 5 million dollars on new Diamonds rather than 50 year old “new” Pipers.

Great shots of a really pretty bird there, Joey G. Sad to think that such an attractive craft will be absent from our skies.