K, I read about the contribution limits and who should be able to donate and not, and I think they are excellent points. And the points you amke above, also.
But:
How do you get around the supremes court argumetn that PAC donations are free speech, and if you do, isn’t this a bad idea in some cases? Aren’t some PAC’s ‘good’?
I mostly agree with your argument there, but have the little sticker I jsut mentioned, and want to hear your thoughts on it.
Aslo, I have learned in dealing with myself, that I have to do so from where I am, not from where I think I should be. It hasn’t been shown to be practical, that way.
So, this is what I’m wondering- I like your ideas, but aren’t they a little Walt Disney-ish, ie: happy ending, simplistic? People like to think they’re hip, sophisticated, in on it. Simple solutions rarely appeal, even if they’re the best ones.
Talk to me babe…