begbert2 cannot debate like an adult

I’d already answered it a dozen times - at that point you were either deliberately trying to muddle the issue, or were terminally stupid. I was giving you the benefit of the doubt and responding as if you weren’t lying about understanding my position, at least a little, which would mean that you could not possibly not know the answer to that question.

Also, I was getting tired of the dumbass juvenile games you were playing.

No, I’m afraid it didn’t. I just kept using different words to explain it in the vain hopes you’d understand it. It didn’t work.

Is that why you started qouting that bit you STILL fail to comprehend over and over like some kind of sixth grader?

You brought the attitude first.

You will now deny that. I will not give a shit that you do, because I know better. I’m sure ivn1188 will believe you though - assuming he’s still following this thread, anyway.

Are you getting confused by your own slashed-up paraphrases? The strawman in question was:

Of course, NO Egoists think that people decide that losing a war was their idea to make themselves happy. That’s retarded. It’s retarded to even suggest it. And it is definitely a strawman.

And either you were being an ass by floating that stupid strawman, or you’re so dumb you don’t even understand the simplistic hedonistic Egoist position. (Which would kind of explain why you were completely unable to grasp my argument - it’s actually a tiny bit tricky! If you turn your head sideways and squint just right, anyway.)

You’re projecting again.