Best book on GWB presidency so far?

Great Debates
1

What do you consider the best book on the presidency of George W. Bush, and why? Here are some of the criteria I consider important (in alphabetical order), although yours may vary.[ul]
[li]Accuracy: A nonfiction book should be free of serious errors or lies.[/li][li]Craft: The author should be able to communicate clearly, in a manner that doesn’t put the reader to sleep.[/li][li]Fairness: I expect the author to have opinions, but not to distort or stack the deck to prove them.[/li][li]Verifiability: As a rule, statements of facts that aren’t common knowledge should be properly attributed and referenced, without excessive reliance on anonymous sources.[/li][/ul]
I don’t have a book to nominate, I’m actually looking for opinions. I would post this in Cafe Society or IMHO, if not for the controversial subject matter.

2

Oh, two more criteria to consider:
[ul]
[li]Breadth: “W: The First 3 1/2 Years” would be more interesting than “Why Bush Dislikes the Kyoto Agreement”[/li][li]Depth: Give me something I’d miss from skimming the Sunday papers.[/li][/ul]

3

There’s a lot of Bush books out there, and I’ve only read a few. But I found The Price of Loyalty to be very good.

4

You expect to find a credible, thoroughly researched book without rabid partisan bias (either hateful or obsequious) on Bush? I’d recommend waiting a decade or two.

5

J.H. Hatfield’s Fortunate Son is amazingly “un-baised” and non-partisan. In spite of how absolutely, factually skewering it is, he never seems to pass any judgement or hold any ill will towards GW. The book is amazingly sympathetic toward him, even while detailingg some blood-boiling circumstances and actions.

6

I’d recommend The Lies of George W. Bush, simply because it (a) spans the entire Bush Presidency to date, (b) lays out all the data in easily-verifiable accounts, © avoids excessive hyperbole or exaggeration, and (d) makes its case in a clear and convincing matter.

Yeah, it’s partisan as heck, but as Paladud points out, it’s too early for a level-headed assessment of the Bush Presidency from anybody.