I was inspired by the Worst Remake Ever thread to start this one.
Which remake is actually better than the original?
The only one that I can think of off the top of my head is Young Guns II.(Yeah, I know it’s not exactly the best movie ever made but I love it) The original was so-so. The photography wasn’t the best and the acting wasn’t that great. Young Guns II on the other hand had good to great acting, Estives rocked as Billy the Kid, beautifull photography, a good story line and a great sound track.
Any other remakes that were better than the original?
Dunno about better, but the 1978 (I think) version of Invasion of the Bodysnatchers was an entirely different creature from the 1956 version; each movie did an interesting job reflecting totally different societal anxieties. I wrote a paper in college on these two :).
And I’m optimistic about Solaris – though I know almost nothing about the upcoming 2002 version, I doubt I’ll be trying to gnaw my arm off, as I did when I watched the 1972 version of the movie.
Despite my love of all things Rat Pack, the original Ocean’s 11 was vastly inferior to Stephen Soderbergh’s recent remake. I suppose Frank and his crew spent too much time boozing and womanizing to worry about turning out a great flick.
And I’ll throw one more out there: the 1959 Ben Hur is better than the 1925 version. I think there’s another one from even earlier (1910’s?), but I’ve never had the opportunity to catch that one.
You know, I while agree WHOLEHEARTEDLY with this one, I’m not even sure if we can legitimately say the earlier film versions actually were “The Lord of the Rings”!