Can you cite a reliable source for this? Because you saying it (or your video claiming it) means nothing. I could equally claim that the twin towers were dropped by space chipmunks with exactly the same level of veracity.
But let’s say there were temperature hot spots in the rubble higher than 2800 F…what do you think that means, exactly? You do realize that the building was on fire, right? And that there were any number of combustibles in the building, including diesel fuel bunkers for backup generators, various flammable cleaning supplies, flammable office supplies and lot of other things that burned, and leaving aside an entire air plane full of jet fuel, right?
Look, we have been through all of this. There is nothing you could be bringing to the table that we haven’t already dealt with in many many threads on this ridiculous subject. But feel free to bring something substantial that you really think is convincing. Don’t just do a drive by ‘Geothermal imaging showing hotspots of 2800 F, and higher, the temperature of melted steel. Ready for: that was kerosene and smoldering office junk doing that’, as that is an assertion without any citation. Put some effort into this. I mean, if we are going to crush yet another 9/11 CT Truther let’s do it right and have some fun!
I think he has fled.
What is the source of information for that particular claim?
That’s not how things work around here. You don’t open a debate in GD just by posting a link; no one is obliged to click it. You are expected to flesh out the topic in your OP, wherein you can summarize the content of the links.
Or maybe they got to him.
Well, if so he’s running true to form for 9/11 Truther types…they all flee, usually after dropping a couple of Must See! video links and maybe making one or two posts vaguely defending their untenable position.
Would be interesting to see if the Truther movement is REALLY gaining steam. Some quick Google searches seem to show that it peaked in 2007 but I wonder where it’s really at. The Kennedy and Moon Hoaxer crowd seems to have leveled off, so I expect something like that with the 9/11 CT nutters too at some point.
So you’re saying it was lava? 
I told them they shouldn’t have built the World Trade Center on that ancient Hawaiian burial ground.
Well, that solves the question of what really happened to Obama’s birth certificate, but it still doesn’t tell us why he has no alibi for December 7th, 1941.
To be fair, the thread title could very well be correct. It might actually be the best-sourced pile of truther hogwash out there. It’s not like that’s a high bar to clear.
All claims based on verifiable sources? Is this claim of 2800 F hotspots backed up by anything verifiable?
By the way, I clicked your first link. The narration started 20 seconds in. Five seconds later, he had said something that I can show to be false. The very first sentence. Not a very good start.
You sat through 25 seconds of that?
You courageous son of a bitch.
If we ever meet, drinks are on me.
Cross posted all over the place. We’re not the forum for spam.