Each claim in the documentary is accompanied by the supporitng source. Be a man and try to rebut one specific claim, instead of running to mama when you hear truth you don’t like.
'Round these parts we don’t take too kindly to OPs that consist solely of dropping a Youtube link without substansive comment.
Why don’t you tell us in your words what you think is substantially established by this video instead of demanding that we give up an hour of our time to hear the same warmed-over bits of dogma that were refuted a decade ago?
Ok. Geothermal imaging showing hotspots of 2800 F, and higher, the temperature of melted steel. Ready for: that was kerosene and smoldering office junk doing that.
Not going to watch random hours-long video from random internet person. If I did that I’d never be able to do anything else. You’re not special, so I’m not going to give your video special treatment.
But I will read your claims. If you want to make an assertion about something, and back it up, then maybe we’ll consider it.
Let me guess, 9/11 Truther CT video? If so, nothing to see here…yet another drive by You Must Watch This VIDEO! on a subject that has been debated to death and I can guarantee that every ‘new’ and fascinating point has already been debunked in triplicate.
If the OP would like to lay out just one point that s/he finds compelling then we can tear that one down and move on. What will it be? The ‘steel doesn’t melt at 1500 degrees!’, or ‘this MUST be explosive demolition with magic nano-thermite!’? There are so many ridiculous claims to choose from and I’m sure we are all waiting with bated (or baited) breath in hopeful anticipation of the next revelation!