There an episode of *L&O: SVU *that makes me nuts, because dramatically, it’s a great episode, but the premise is flawed.
It’s called “Stolen,” and it’s the one where a recent kidnapping helps Cragen solve a child disappearance from a long time ago, when he was at the 27th precinct.
OPEN SPOILERS:
A woman is murdered, and her newborn son is missing from his crib.
That makes sense if someone killed her to get the baby, right? but that’s not what happened. The person who killed her was a woman who also had a baby by the same father, and wanted to marry him, and didn’t want him to find out he had another child. So she killed, KILLED, the mother, then while she was supposed to be looking after a newborn of her own, went through an elaborate caper of representing herself as the mother of the baby with the dead mother, and gives him to a private adoption attorney.
Right?
No. She just killed the mother-- she would have killed the baby too, right? If she was overcome by hormones, or something, she would have dropped him off at a safe haven. Or even not at one, but just left him some place like a hospital. Getting herself fake ID to misrepresent herself as the mother was just too much. It’s necessary, because it’s how the baby eventually gets traced, but it’s stupid, right?
The episode doesn’t focus much on that, though. It focuses on Cragen finding the kid after all these years, and then the custody between the adoptive parents and the bio father. That’s all nice and dramatic, and upon first viewing, distracts you from the glaring plot hole. But if you see it a second or third time, and start to think about it, it falls apart.