Biden v Trump. Why? Please explain to an Aussie

Agreed, but I think it is important to call out that it is not merely that Trump’s speeches are incoherent and bigoted / fascist.

But also, if we’re trying to claim that Biden has memory or confusion issues, then oh my christ we can find countless examples of far worse from Trump, from repeatedly forgetting who the president is, to who he’s running against in the primary, to probably confusing dreams with reality (you need to show ID to buy bread).

I agree w/ the OP to the extent that I wish we had better, younger candidates. But I also agree with the majority of respondents that the OP grossly exaggerates Biden’s infirmity.

OP - would you like to point out which of Biden’s decision/positions/policies/appointments you believe evidence dementia?

I don’t know about cheese and crackers, but presidents tend to be oldsters compared to prime ministers. Only one U.S. president was ever as young as Justin Trudeau when he became PM. No U.S, president was ever as young, when assuming the top office, as Rishi Sunak. And a couple of current African presidents are older than Biden.

Emmanuel Macron Is a young president, but France doesn’t have a pure presidential system.

Why do presidents run old? Don’t know. Should those old presidents quit? It depends, but when there’s no parliament that can order you out, it’s hard to arrange.

This brushes up against the idea (and I’m not accusing you of this, just mentioning it) that a certain age invariably makes a person less able or fit for the Top Job. Biden is a gaffe machine, as has been mentioned for years, and between that, his stutter, and stress, a few slips of the tongue are to be expected. But I don’t think Biden’s slipping.

Since your premise is false, there’s no point worrying about the conclusions you draw.

The OP’s “wheeled out” is particularly ironic because Biden still rides a bicycle in his 80s while Trump likely never learned how, famously rides carts rather than walking the course when golfing, and is strongly rumored to believe exercise is bad for you because it drains an inborn and non-replenishable ration of vitality.

You don’t even need to be British. Irish and Commonwealth citizens can become an MP (and be eligible to be PM), provided they have residency rights in the UK. So we could have a Canadian, a Pakistani or a Barbadian as PM.

The OP sounds like someone that gets their info from Fox.

Cite. Show me the picture of him being ‘wheeled out to make statements’.
I mean, it’s possible, but I don’t recall seeing him in a wheelchair. However, you stated that you have and I’m curious about the details of that.

I don’t have an opinion on whether Joe is becoming more fit due to experience, or less fit due to age.

But there’s one part of the POTUS job where, even if age is just a number, being an octogenarian likely reduces chances of success. And that is – running for re-election.

Actually, there were two US presidents younger than JTrudeau: TRoosevelt and Kennedy. Roosevelt was 42 years, 10 months, and Kennedy was 43 years, 7 months upon inauguration. Trudeau was 43 years, 10 months.

Sunak was about half a year younger than TR, so that one is right.

As far as the idea that the US always has old presidents, that’s patently wrong. For example, Obama was only 48 or so upon inauguration.

I don’t have real evidence that national presidents skew older than other sorts of supremos – just a hunch. And I also wanted to participate without piling onto saying stui_magpie is wrong.

There’s nothing we can say to change the fact that a first digit of eight is age number which is going to hurt Joe Biden. Voters who don’t focus on issues do exist and, stui_magpie, while I dispute your dementia diagnosis, you creatively showed us some of what Biden is up against.

Rank # President Age at Inauguration
1 46 Joe Biden 78 years 61 days
2 45 Donald J. Trump 70 years 220 days
3 40 Ronald Reagan 69 years 348 days
4 9 William Henry Harrison 68 years 23 days
5 15 James Buchanan 65 years 315 days
6 41 George H. W. Bush 64 years 222 days
7 12 Zachary Taylor 64 years 100 days
8 34 Dwight D. Eisenhower 62 years 98 days
9 7 Andrew Jackson 61 years 354 days
10 2 John Adams 61 years 125 days
11 38 Gerald R. Ford 61 years 26 days
12 33 Harry S. Truman 60 years 339 days
13 5 James Monroe 58 years 310 days
14 4 James Madison 57 years 353 days
15 3 Thomas Jefferson 57 years 325 days
16 6 John Quincy Adams 57 years 236 days
17 1 George Washington 57 years 68 days
18 17 Andrew Johnson 56 years 107 days
19 28 Woodrow Wilson 56 years 66 days
20 37 Richard M. Nixon 56 years 11 days
21 24 Grover Cleveland 55 years 351 days
22 23 Benjamin Harrison 55 years 196 days
23 29 Warren G. Harding 55 years 122 days
24 36 Lyndon B. Johnson 55 years 87 days
25 31 Herbert Hoover 54 years 206 days
26 43 George W. Bush 54 years 198 days
27 19 Rutherford B. Hayes 54 years 151 days
28 8 Martin Van Buren 54 years 89 days
29 25 William McKinley 54 years 34 days
30 39 Jimmy Carter 52 years 111 days
31 16 Abraham Lincoln 52 years 20 days
32 21 Chester A. Arthur 51 years 349 days
33 27 William H. Taft 51 years 170 days
34 32 Franklin D. Roosevelt 51 years 33 days
35 30 Calvin Coolidge 51 years 29 days
36 10 John Tyler 51 years 6 days
37 13 Millard Fillmore 50 years 183 days
38 11 James K. Polk 49 years 123 days
39 20 James A. Garfield 49 years 105 days
40 14 Franklin Pierce 48 years 101 days
41 22 Grover Cleveland 47 years 351 days
42 44 Barack Obama 47 years 169 days
43 18 Ulysses S. Grant 46 years 311 days
44 42 Bill Clinton 46 years 154 days
45 35 John F. Kennedy 43 years 236 days
46 26 Theodore Roosevelt 42 years 322 days

Well if Biden wins, he can’t run again so that’s not a problem at all. The same is true of Trump.

Biden: We run the elected candidate. He is in, he has that, if he has at least a 40% approval. Gerry Ford was not running as he was in fact never elected.

Trump: He is getting revenge. MAGA people are getting revenge. Against foreigners, China and the elites.

Setting aside the specific complaints about both Biden & Trump, the process for selecting the President in the US has a lot of structural issues that, to an outsider AND an insider leave one saying, “How did we end up with these two as our choices?”

First off, both of them are coming into the election having served a term as President. So, they are both running as “incumbents”, a rare occurrence historically. For voters and the Party structures, there are huge advantages to being an incumbent, compared to other candidates. In that they are familiar, and have proven success in electoral politics. There is an enormous risk in trying to organize around an alternative to an incumbent.

Stepping back, our State level primary/caucus process seems to me to be a poor way to select our top candidates. Due to the money raising aspect, and the calendar, generally a tiny handful of States get to decide who goes forward. Often these deciders are zealots and State party functionaries, as turnout is relatively low. For voters in the remaining States, their preferred candidate is often already out of the running. So they are left with endorsing the front-runner, or not participating (voting). It is sometimes said that the primary process is not really about selecting the best, but instead eliminating the lesser candidates, until you have the “last man (or woman) standing”.

Well, he wheels around just fine, Trump can’t use a bicycle.

Speaking about “his cheese is barely clinging to his cracker” he already demonstrated that he knows how to get capable people to take care of the business of government who don’t leave early and often. That Trump had many of “the best people” that he chooses leaving office early and often (and many times in disgrace), shows already who not to vote now. Flawed as Biden can be, he is still the best choice since Trump has been reported to feel betrayed by the ones he chose before and now has reported to be looking for total loyalists…

That will not be conductive to good government, the chances that his appointments in a theoretical 2nd administration will be even worse than the last one, were magnified (Magafied?) 200%.

This is incorrect and uninformed. Look, I live in a retirement community. We have people here from, well, my age (mid-70s) to over 100. Believe me, I know dementia onset when I see it, and Biden doesn’t fit the profile. He doesn’t speak well because he has a speech impediment and has never spoken all that well. He moves carefully on uneven surfaces, which is definitely wise as you get older. But his analytical skills are there, as are his decision-making abilities. And one must remember that he doesn’t make decisions in a vacuum (unlike his adversary). There is a large contingent of advisors and staff who actively analyze any important matters before a policy is acted on. The stress of that office is enormous; if you look at before and after photos of past presidents, they age rapidly during an eight-year stint (or at least they do if they’re actually doing the job). If you want to see demented and non-functional, look at video of some bygone members of Congress who literally had to be wheeled onto the floor and then told how to vote.

From what I can see, Americans will not admit any decline in Biden. No, he doesn’t have dementia or any serious cognitive issues. Yes, he is in good shape for his age. However, what decline is apparent must not be acknowledged lest… something.

Not really, I said elsewhere that one should choose the old fellow that has some memory issues that has showed no ill-intent, rather than the old guy that willfully forgets and has ill-intent as a feature.

You seem to be confused and/or bereft of diagnostic skills.

Verbal slip-ups and misstatements have been common among far younger politicians but are magnified when you have someone Biden’s age. Meanwhile, Trump in his late 70s issues a constant barrage of goofs and craziness, confuses Biden with Obama and recently congratulated the Kansas City Chiefs “from the great state of Kansas”. Oopsie.

Many think both these candidates are too old and should hang it up. The immediate issue is their track record and what we can expect from a new four-year term.

Voters have already demonstrated that perception of mild mental impairment is far less concerning than the prospect of installing an sleazeball in a position of power (electing Fetterman over Oz in the Pennsylvania Senate race). Thus for many, Biden looks like a far better bet than an arguably more impaired Trump.

And remember, Tommy Shanks beat the slimy Vic Hedges in the Melonville mayoral race.