Agreed, but I think it is important to call out that it is not merely that Trump’s speeches are incoherent and bigoted / fascist.
But also, if we’re trying to claim that Biden has memory or confusion issues, then oh my christ we can find countless examples of far worse from Trump, from repeatedly forgetting who the president is, to who he’s running against in the primary, to probably confusing dreams with reality (you need to show ID to buy bread).
I agree w/ the OP to the extent that I wish we had better, younger candidates. But I also agree with the majority of respondents that the OP grossly exaggerates Biden’s infirmity.
OP - would you like to point out which of Biden’s decision/positions/policies/appointments you believe evidence dementia?
I don’t know about cheese and crackers, but presidents tend to be oldsters compared to prime ministers. Only one U.S. president was ever as young as Justin Trudeau when he became PM. No U.S, president was ever as young, when assuming the top office, as Rishi Sunak. And a couple of current African presidents are older than Biden.
Emmanuel Macron Is a young president, but France doesn’t have a pure presidential system.
Why do presidents run old? Don’t know. Should those old presidents quit? It depends, but when there’s no parliament that can order you out, it’s hard to arrange.
This brushes up against the idea (and I’m not accusing you of this, just mentioning it) that a certain age invariably makes a person less able or fit for the Top Job. Biden is a gaffe machine, as has been mentioned for years, and between that, his stutter, and stress, a few slips of the tongue are to be expected. But I don’t think Biden’s slipping.
The OP’s “wheeled out” is particularly ironic because Biden still rides a bicycle in his 80s while Trump likely never learned how, famously rides carts rather than walking the course when golfing, and is strongly rumored to believe exercise is bad for you because it drains an inborn and non-replenishable ration of vitality.
You don’t even need to be British. Irish and Commonwealth citizens can become an MP (and be eligible to be PM), provided they have residency rights in the UK. So we could have a Canadian, a Pakistani or a Barbadian as PM.
The OP sounds like someone that gets their info from Fox.
Cite. Show me the picture of him being ‘wheeled out to make statements’.
I mean, it’s possible, but I don’t recall seeing him in a wheelchair. However, you stated that you have and I’m curious about the details of that.
I don’t have an opinion on whether Joe is becoming more fit due to experience, or less fit due to age.
But there’s one part of the POTUS job where, even if age is just a number, being an octogenarian likely reduces chances of success. And that is – running for re-election.
Actually, there were two US presidents younger than JTrudeau: TRoosevelt and Kennedy. Roosevelt was 42 years, 10 months, and Kennedy was 43 years, 7 months upon inauguration. Trudeau was 43 years, 10 months.
Sunak was about half a year younger than TR, so that one is right.
As far as the idea that the US always has old presidents, that’s patently wrong. For example, Obama was only 48 or so upon inauguration.
I don’t have real evidence that national presidents skew older than other sorts of supremos – just a hunch. And I also wanted to participate without piling onto saying stui_magpie is wrong.
There’s nothing we can say to change the fact that a first digit of eight is age number which is going to hurt Joe Biden. Voters who don’t focus on issues do exist and, stui_magpie, while I dispute your dementia diagnosis, you creatively showed us some of what Biden is up against.
Biden: We run the elected candidate. He is in, he has that, if he has at least a 40% approval. Gerry Ford was not running as he was in fact never elected.
Trump: He is getting revenge. MAGA people are getting revenge. Against foreigners, China and the elites.
Setting aside the specific complaints about both Biden & Trump, the process for selecting the President in the US has a lot of structural issues that, to an outsider AND an insider leave one saying, “How did we end up with these two as our choices?”
First off, both of them are coming into the election having served a term as President. So, they are both running as “incumbents”, a rare occurrence historically. For voters and the Party structures, there are huge advantages to being an incumbent, compared to other candidates. In that they are familiar, and have proven success in electoral politics. There is an enormous risk in trying to organize around an alternative to an incumbent.
Stepping back, our State level primary/caucus process seems to me to be a poor way to select our top candidates. Due to the money raising aspect, and the calendar, generally a tiny handful of States get to decide who goes forward. Often these deciders are zealots and State party functionaries, as turnout is relatively low. For voters in the remaining States, their preferred candidate is often already out of the running. So they are left with endorsing the front-runner, or not participating (voting). It is sometimes said that the primary process is not really about selecting the best, but instead eliminating the lesser candidates, until you have the “last man (or woman) standing”.
Well, he wheels around just fine, Trump can’t use a bicycle.
Speaking about “his cheese is barely clinging to his cracker” he already demonstrated that he knows how to get capable people to take care of the business of government who don’t leave early and often. That Trump had many of “the best people” that he chooses leaving office early and often (and many times in disgrace), shows already who not to vote now. Flawed as Biden can be, he is still the best choice since Trump has been reported to feel betrayed by the ones he chose before and now has reported to be looking for total loyalists…
That will not be conductive to good government, the chances that his appointments in a theoretical 2nd administration will be even worse than the last one, were magnified (Magafied?) 200%.
This is incorrect and uninformed. Look, I live in a retirement community. We have people here from, well, my age (mid-70s) to over 100. Believe me, I know dementia onset when I see it, and Biden doesn’t fit the profile. He doesn’t speak well because he has a speech impediment and has never spoken all that well. He moves carefully on uneven surfaces, which is definitely wise as you get older. But his analytical skills are there, as are his decision-making abilities. And one must remember that he doesn’t make decisions in a vacuum (unlike his adversary). There is a large contingent of advisors and staff who actively analyze any important matters before a policy is acted on. The stress of that office is enormous; if you look at before and after photos of past presidents, they age rapidly during an eight-year stint (or at least they do if they’re actually doing the job). If you want to see demented and non-functional, look at video of some bygone members of Congress who literally had to be wheeled onto the floor and then told how to vote.
From what I can see, Americans will not admit any decline in Biden. No, he doesn’t have dementia or any serious cognitive issues. Yes, he is in good shape for his age. However, what decline is apparent must not be acknowledged lest… something.
Not really, I said elsewhere that one should choose the old fellow that has some memory issues that has showed no ill-intent, rather than the old guy that willfully forgets and has ill-intent as a feature.
You seem to be confused and/or bereft of diagnostic skills.
Verbal slip-ups and misstatements have been common among far younger politicians but are magnified when you have someone Biden’s age. Meanwhile, Trump in his late 70s issues a constant barrage of goofs and craziness, confuses Biden with Obama and recently congratulated the Kansas City Chiefs “from the great state of Kansas”. Oopsie.
Many think both these candidates are too old and should hang it up. The immediate issue is their track record and what we can expect from a new four-year term.
Voters have already demonstrated that perception of mild mental impairment is far less concerning than the prospect of installing an sleazeball in a position of power (electing Fetterman over Oz in the Pennsylvania Senate race). Thus for many, Biden looks like a far better bet than an arguably more impaired Trump.
And remember, Tommy Shanks beat the slimy Vic Hedges in the Melonville mayoral race.