Big Brother Wants To Know Who & Where You Are Passes House

So what’s wrong with “mission creep”?

I would feel less free if I knew that my movements might be monitored by the federal government. This card, at the very least, facilitates such tracking.

Failure to establish barriers against mission creep is either careless (if you merely failed to think about the issue) or dishonest (if you want the results of “mission creep” without subjecting them to public debate up front*).

Since the former cannot be applicable (I’ve already brought the matter to your attention) and the latter presumably is not (I’m willing to assume intellectual integrity on the part of my fellow Dopers), the debate turns not to whether to prevent mission creep, but the exact mechanisms for doing so. Anybody got a better idea than making the document more an ID Brick than an ID Card?

*(I will not hijack this thread into a commentary on Dubya. I will not turn this thread into a commentary on Dubya. I will not turn this thread into a commentary on Dubya…)

:dubious: Or it could just be the result of not being all that worried about “mission creep.” You cited the way we use the Social Security number for identifying purposes as an example of “mission creep” – and frankly, I just don’t see any down side to that.* You say “mission creep,” I say “adaptation of existing mechanisms in response to changing social circumstances.” IOW, a good thing.

See post 31, above. Of course, that would require a constitutional amendment. Short of that, whatever legislation creates the national ID card could also specify what it can and can’t be used for, assuming that’s a problem.
*When my grandfather was first assigned a Social Security number, he came home and bitched, “They put a number on me!” :rolleyes: But it never was any practical inconvenience to him, and of course he wasn’t too proud to draw SS benefits when he reached retirement age.

I still think concern over “mission creep” WRT a national ID card is silly, but I couldn’t resist sharing this tidbit from the “Jokes” page of Robert Anton Wilson’s website. (RAW is a small-l libertarian. He once wrote of having no choices he could conscientiously support in the 1980 presidential election, “Ideologically, I suppose my choice should have been Ed Clark, but I’m not that kind of Libertarian. I don’t hate poor people.”)

From http://www.rawilson.com/jokes.shtml: