So in reading about the reaction to the Lost finale, it seems like the consensus is that making the ALT timeline some sort of afterlife was really stupid.
But is it the biggest finale blunder ever? I think I hit some of the biggest ones, but I missed any, there’s the wonderful “other” (and no, not Ben, although he is cheery).
I actually liked the end of Lost, a lot. But then, I’ve always approached it as a fantasy yarn.
I also liked the endings for Sopranos, *BSG *and QL. The endings for *Roseanne *and *Seinfeld *sucked, but they were both sitcoms, so their resolutions weren’t all that important in the grand sceme of things. We were there for the laughs, not the arc.
I never watched or cared about Rosanne, X-Files or The Sopranos, and I thought the ending to Quantum Leap was perfect. Seinfeld always was lightweight, with no emotional investment. That leaves Lost and Battlestar, and I seriously gave up on Lost after Season 3. That leaves Ron Moore’s betrayal as the biggest blunder.
I didn’t realize when I posted that this was going to be a poll.
I’m voting for Roseanne slightly beating out The X-Files, mainly because of what they did to Dan.
If Next Generation’s finale had been on the list, I might have voted for it because of the glaring plot hole (which would have been so easy to fix) and what they did to Deanna.
Totally disagree that the ending of Lost was a blunder–I thought the finale was near perfect.
Seinfeld was probably most disappointing to me. I thought Sopranos was the worst ending, but I give them bonus points for at least trying something interesting, even if I thought it failed.
Roseanne’s entire last season (or was it last two seasons? Everything after the lottery) was a total train wreck, which only amplified the terrible finish to what used to be a good show.
(I don’t count myself among them, but a lot of people really hated the St. Elsewhere snow-globe ending. That could be a possible “other” choice.)
I think people who hated the LOST finale fail to realize just how bad finales can be. X-files made no sense and I’m glad they abandoned all of that crap for the second movie(which I rather liked, by the way).
I agree that it was great and I think the negative reactions are just more vocal than the positive ones. I don’t think there is a consensus that it was stupid or bad at all.
I absolutely disagree that The Soprano’s was in any way a blunder and in fact gave fans who are willing to use their imaginations and be sophisticated enough to not need a pat, storybook ending the almost perfect way to walk from a series whose very heart was about uncertainly.
What??? Someone needs to spoil Roseanne for me; because I thought it ended after the season where they won the lottery. It was a novel? What did they do to Dan that was so bad?
Do you mean the fact that the anti-time anomaly grows as it goes backwards in time, and yet they see it when they return after its creation in the future timeline? That’s always bugged me, especially since Picard’s figuring out the paradox was supposed to be this huge deal, and yet he’s still not really getting it (but neither are the writers . . . )
That said, I enjoyed the episode in spite of this screwup.
Most surreal of all is the season’s final episode, in which Roseanne reveals that the events in most of the series were all the pages of her writings. The reality is that Dan’s heart attack killed him, the Conner family didn’t win the lottery, Becky married David instead of Mark, Darlene married Mark instead of David, and Jackie was gay rather than straight.
I personally loved the Roseanne ending. I thought the last season did not play well across a 16 or 18 week stretch but if you get the DVDs and watch it straight through as a single episode it makes quite a bit of sense. I also loved that the show spent the first 6-7 seasons being about a family that is really struggling to make it and the finale brought it all back to that original message that the show started with in the beginning. Yeah, it sucks that Dan had a heart attack and died but that kind of thing really happens. That is also what caused her to sit down and write it all out as a novel as a form of therapy for herself.
The finale for “Deep Space Nine” deserves a mention. From the very first episode, it’s established that Sisko has some “very important destiny” tied up with the wormhole beings/prophets/whatever. In the final episode, his very important destiny is to…
I didn’t have a problem with Roseanne’s using her writing a novel as form of therapy after everything happened and as explanation.
It was the crappy writing and scripts, the stupid elements (the lottery winning and silliness of the situations it put them), and how some characters I really liked were turned into caricatures of the themselves for most of the last two seasons, as if they’d run out of ideas or stopped trying.
Pretty much. They should approach it in the future timeline and it should be minuscule, even microscopic. They need to be sure what it is, so they MagicRay it and poof, it simply vanishes altogether, because the instant the ray hit it is when it was created, but growing backward in time, so the instant after the ray hits it, it doesn’t exist.