So Rachel Frederickson started at 260lbs and ended up at 105, losing 60% of her body weight. She’s 5’4 so 105lbs is extremely light. In fact, her BMI is 18, and “underweight” is classified at 18.5. To me she looks super-thin but not emaciated or any other extreme adjectives people are tossing around. I think most of the outrage is in the amount lost than the actual end result. How say you?
(before and after pictures of the entire cast):
I don’t think Rachel’s loss is any more extreme than Tumi’s loss (image 11/17).
I disagree entirely with this. I have been reading a lot of blogs, media articles, and discussions about Rachel’s weight loss, and every single one of them has focused on the way she looks, her lack of muscle tone, and her apparent physical weakness. If they have mentioned the number of pounds lost, it has been in passing only. I don’t follow the show, and have not taken a position on whether she lost too much weight, but the clear consensus among the outraged is that she looks terrible, not that the specific amount of weight she lost was too much.
From an article you linked: “Many tweeted that Fredrickson looked anorexic and unhealthy, while others congratulated her for dropping 155 pounds.”
People who were paying attention to the amount lost were congratulatory, while people paying attention to her appearance were shocked.
I agree she does look worryingly thin. But you can’t tell how healthy someone is by the way they look. Someone can be overweight and healthy, someone can be very thin and healthy, someone can be average weight and very unhealthy.
However, it seems to me that the whole Biggest Loser show promotes unhealthy behavior. I’ve read articles about how the contestants exercise unhealthy amounts of time, often get injuries, dehydrate themselves or do other drastic measures before weigh-in times to be their lowest. Then of course many of them gain a lot of their weight back after the show. I’ve heard around half of the contestants gain most or all of their weight back.
All of their behavior of course makes sense for a game show where they have the chance to win a lot of money. I would dehydrate myself and exercise too much and do other things if it helped me win $250K. The problem is if The Biggest Loser doesn’t just present itself as a gameshow, but if it instead presents itself as good examples on how to lose weight and be healthy.
Frederickson was smart to get that thin, I don’t think she would have won if she didn’t. She started at 260 lbs so I think numerically it would make it harder for her to win rather than people who started at 300 or 400 pounds. I don’t know if Frederickson is healthy or not now. I hope she is regularly seeing some doctors, since I think that amount of weight loss fairly quickly can maybe cause issues. If she is too skinny, then hopefully she can work with doctors on a plan and gain 5 or 10 pounds or however much to get to a healthy point. But she wasn’t at all stupid or crazy to get down to the weight that she did.
Most of the contestants do gain back the weight, so she’s probably going to be okay. Really, at the speed these guys lose, it’s not all that healthy anyways.
I’ve never watched this show, but from what I read of this controversy, this woman used to be thin and gained the weight after a breakup. I wonder if it was easier for her to lose the weight and will be easier to keep it off than someone who was fat their entire life.
I would say probably yes. For a significant portion of overweight people IMHO, the path to obesity is lined with a lifetime of poor choices regarding diet and exercise coupled with medical issues; many of these are learned behaviors from parents, etc… These kind of lifestyle habits are incredibly hard to break.
Someone who has been healthy (she was an Olympic athlete, right?), and then basically went on a pizza bender after a bad breakup is going to be in a better position to keep weight off… not the least of which is because exercising regularly is probably already a part of her lifestyle.
18 Percent body fat is pretty low for a woman. Women will start losing their period around 16 percent, right? At a certain point, you need fat to cushion and protect organs.
She looks thin and fit to me. Her legs aren’t sticks and have good muscle and tone. She looks just like any number of female triathletes that I hang out with on a regular basis.
I will say that her face does look a bit off though. It may be a combination of pre-final weigh in dehydration, and the fact that she’ll have some loose skin left over from being so obese.
I hope she keeps the weight off, I think she looks good and applaud her.
I don’t watch the show (well I channel-surfed onto it a couple times and didn’t like it) because I can’t stand the yelling and pressure tactics that the trainers use. But that’s me.
At the end of the day it’s a GAME SHOW where you win if you lose the most weight. Hell, I weigh 105 lbs and if someone offered me the chance at $250,000 to lose some I’d be all CHA-CHING. In this culture we are bombarded with “lose weight now!” by the media - even on the articles I read about Rachel’s “unhealthy” appearance there were ads for weight loss programs.
I actually feel really bad for her. It’s like she went from “Hey fatty lay off the cheeseburgers, you look disgusting” to “Ewww, go eat a sammich, you look disgusting.” You just can’t win in this society when it comes to your weight.
Before the weigh-in, a lot of contestants won’t eat or drink for awhile. I’m guessing once she adds a pound or three of water weight, she’ll look less mummy-esque.
In the penultimate episode, Rachel looked amazing – so this came together exactly the way I expected it would. She would lose a ludicrous amount of weight, cruise to the title and get her payday.
Now with a cool quarter-mil in the bank, she can now put 25 pounds back on and look terrific. I full expect that when she makes an appearance next season, she’ll look very good.
But yeah, she looked way, way better at 260 than she did at 105.
It’s a weight loss contest with a cash prize. Anyone who thinks ‘health’ has anything to do with it is fooling themselves. She put in months of hard work and won a lot of money, good for her.
I’m almost the exact same height/weight, but we don’t look very similar. Losing vast amounts of weight as fast and violently as they do on that show is extremely hard on the body, not to mention they weigh in like boxers, dehydrated and hungry. I’m sure she’ll be looking and feeling much better in a few months, regardless of what she weighs in pounds.
I would say probably no. I gained a lot of weight (comfort eating) after I was dumped by my fiancé when I was 19 (1972). I’ve been losing and gaining ever since. I know I’m only one person (anecdotes =/= etc etc) but I think the speed with which she’s lost the weight is worrying and does not augur well for future healthy eating.
She looks like an incredibly well toned skinny woman. Not like someone with an eating disorder at all, more like a marathon runner. Do you guys who think she looks like she has an eating disorder think this people have an eating disorder? Edit: ok after clicking on the links those are not quite representative of what she looks like, i saw her on video on GMA the other day and every time she moved her arms muscle bulged out.
