I am shocked, shocked! that you don’t believe the OP is the most brilliant when it comes to . . . Oh wait, never mind. My reality wasn’t adjusted properly. You’re good.
Bill Gates was always a bit of an asshole who was not above lying to people to get them to do what he wanted.
Therefore the WHO and UNAIDs are both wrong?
(plus, what bizarre ulterior motive are you thinking Gates has for circumcising a bunch of men on the other side of the world if he’s lying about the whole HIV thing.)
Perhaps he collects foreskins.
Ew.
- Collect foreskins.
- ???
- Profit.
And again, ew.
He’ll start a Museum of African Foreskins and get a huge tax write-off.
His name is Bill, not David!
[Rimshot]
It is actually part of his plan:
- Profit
- Sneakily kill people in Africa by making it look like I’m helping them, even though there are cheaper, more efficient and more fun ways I could do it.
- ???
- Rule the world
What IS it with this place that attracts so many anti-circumcision ranters?
People who want explanations behind their amputations?
Don’t be ridiculous! He’s the greatest goddamn motherfucking hero the world has ever seen and single handedly carries the torch of human civilisation.
Well, they can be cultivated for fibroblasts for use in cosmetics, among other things. I was reading about disturbing things in cosmetics only the other day, foreskins being the third most disturbing by my reckoning, and saw an article claiming one can be worth $100,000. But I expect these ones are going to waste.
That’s why he told them it would save them from fatal illness. Which isn’t true, I posted a metanalysis to that effect further up, and even if it was would still be nothing compared to the humble french letter, but anyone who believes it is would not be unreasonable in consenting to the procedure.