Note that he did not make these statements in Germany, but that a YouTube video of these comments (like all YouTube videos) could be viewed in Germany.
So what do you legal eagles say? If a person sits in the United States and denies the holocaust, can he be extradited to Germany to face charges because his comments were posted on YouTube?
Isn’t Germany going too far here to stifle free speech?
I don’t personally support criminal penalties for denying the Holocaust, but I do have to say that of all human rights abuses occurring in the world right now, this is among the ones that saddens and bothers me the least.
Is there anything the RCC can point at lately as a PR benefit? This guy and the guy who said the molestation charges were like the Holocaust should fight it out.
Regensburg is in Germany.
Well, apperantly the Germans still take it very seriously, if some Tommy claims that the Holocaust did not happen.
Why a Tommy would say such an idiotic rubish is beyond me and to top it, he is a Bishop.
If someone just denies the holocaust it in a pub while drunk, nobody is dragging you to court, it’s a different story when it’s a public figure.
Going to far, maybe… the Germans certainly have their reasons for it. Maybe in another couple of decades it will look differently.
As long as people lived through the holocaust, people will take it ott serious. Personally, I laugh at this stage about someone as stupid as this clown.
If you denie the holocaust outside of Germany, you can not be trialed in Germany, unless you are representing Germany as a Political Figure.
Well, sloppy reading by me. I saw something about the interview being conducted for Swedish TV, and just assumed it was shot in Sweden. If it happened on German soil, that would give them jurisdiction.
I’m no legal eagle, but from what I understand, countries will only extradite a person if the crime they’re accused of is also a crime in that country. So no, a US citizen who goes to Germany, denies the Holocaust, then returns to the US could not be extradited.
It’s like a weird sitcom concept. But I think you have an extra Episcopalian in there. He was an Anglican, then became a Catholic and got mixed up with SSPX. Lefebvre made him a bishop, which got him excommunicated, because the Pope had said that Lefebvre shouldn’t go around making people bishops. Then in 2009, the Vatican reversed the excomm on the people that Lefebvre made bishop, including this guy.
It might be the references on the wiki page to “episcopal succession.” I’ve sometimes had to explain that episcopal succession is not the same as Episcopalian.
By “episcopal consecration”, they mean, “consecrated as a bishop”, which is what led to his excommunication, because the guy who made him a bishop was a schismatic Catholic leader who had been told he couldn’t make people bishops without the consent of the pope. It doesn’t refer to the Episcopalian Church of the US or Canada.
This legal principle has been done away with in the EU. A citizen of one EU country can be extradited to another EU country for a “crime” that is not illegal in the country where the person lives.
And Germany should of course be taken out and flogged for having such idiotic rules.