Is that necessary? I mean “black names”? What exactly is a black name? Why can’t Hugo, Andrew and Claudette be considered “black” names? Why are they automatically assumed to be white names?
Here’s my solution. Take the top 100 most common names for the previous year and use a random number generator to pick the name. Democracy and impartiality. How could anyone argue against that?
Well, Democrat Texans will now have to refrain from claims that the Republicans have any corner on the dim bulb concession in Texas.
As noted in the article and above, (some) women raised hell that using only female names was detrimental to perceptions of women, and now a black woman is mad that we are not using “black” names to equally abuse blacks?
I like the idea of Italian-American hurricane names. It might be interesting to follow Hurricane Ange, Hurricane Vinny, Hurricane Salvatore, Hurricane Paulie, Hurricane Joey, Hurricane Ant’ny, Hurricane Vito and Hurricane Rocco.
I also think Asian-American hurricane names are a must. After all, they’re underrepresented in American popular culture. Therefore, it’s a must that we have hurricanes bearing such Asian names as Cindy, Julie, Robert and John.
I’d like to hear from people named DeShaun or Kiesha to see what they think.
Is it a good thing to have a hurricane with the same name or bad?
Maybe it’s neither, maybe it’s just representative of the culture naming them. If it’s really value neutral, then yes, I don’t see any reason why there shouldn’t be African-American names attached.
The crap that Limbaugh spewed in response hardly shows any higher intelligence than Jackson’s. I don’t think I can agree with a single point he made.
As for an alternative naming scheme, I suggest pet names, like Sparky or Precious.