Forrest Gump was unknown until the Tom Hanks movie.
Kathy Reichs’s Bones mysteries were not popular until the TV series
Richard Hooker’s novel MAS*H received a small boost from Altman’s movie and a huge one from the TV series.
But the biggest boost has to belong to Wicked. Author Gregory Maguire had written three movels that barely managed a cult following. One hugely successful stage musical, and he gets to write three more Wicked novels. And the books are so worth reading.
I was going to list a few other films that were wildly successful that were derived from books (The Maltese Falcon, Gone With the Wind), but it appears like their respective novels were fairly successful anyways. While both those and others were popular in both forms way back when, now they’re mostly remembered for the films only.
Untrue. The Kathy Reichs “Bones” series was (and is) tremendously popular. It’s more popular because of the show, but the books were always bestsellers.
I’m not too sure how true that is, based largely on the fact that I had known about and even read the book a few years before the musical premiered. And I tend to be behind the curve on all pop culture stuff nowadays (I only just recently began watching “Breaking Bad.”)
Anyway, as for other suggestions - how popular were the “Sookie Stackhouse” books before “True Blood” began? I at least heard of the TV show before I’d heard of the books.
How about James Bond? I’d always been under the impression that Ian Fleming’s books were not too well known until the movies came out. True yea/nay?
Moderately, at least here in the library. You could usually count on finding a couple on the shelf, but almost never was the entire series in at one time, which is usually a sign that one or two regular patrons were working their way through it.
No. James Bond was successful enough to begin with, but became massively popular when Dr. No was listed as one of JFK’s favorite books. The movie rode that crest.
Wouldn’t practically every book that’s ever been adapted into another media become better known through the adaptation? It seems like the only way this could fail to increase the profile of a book would be if only people who had already heard of the book ever heard of the adaptation, and that’s unlikely to be the case with a Hollywood movie or TV show.
If the OP is looking for books that were actually obscure before being adapted, I remember hearing that the novel Sideways wasn’t even published until after someone bought the movie rights. I don’t think the book is particularly well-known even now, other than as “the book the movie Sideways was based on”, but that’s better than it was doing before the movie was released.
FWIW, I have read Sideways and thought the movie was much better. I’d say the novel *deserves *to only be known as the book the movie Sideways was based on.
Lots of comic books series were relatively unknown before being made in movies; The Crow, Ghost World, A History of Violence, Kick-Ass, The Mask, Men in Black, Road to Perdition, Scott Pilgrim vs. the World, Sin City, 300, V for Vendetta, Wanted.
The Princess Bride is a weird special case. It was written as a movie first, but the movie script didn’t sell so it was novelized and the book ended up being published first*. Sort of like 2001: A Space Odyssey, it isn’t so much an adaptation as a concurrent re-imagining.
I think Fight Club belongs on the list.
*I’m going by memory of Goldman’s autobiography. I feel like I am a bit fuzzy on a couple of details, but that’s more or less what happened.