Boring psychopaths

I’m really surprised that number is so low, the difference between a normal psychopath and successful upper level manager is the money they are paid to do it…

This link says that 10% of managers are corporate psychopaths, I’m quite certain CEO’s would have a higher percentage. Ok, perhaps not, but perhaps the managers they employ: http://robertmijas.com/blog/the-corporate-psychopath-and-the-window-of-empathy/

There were non pyschopathic Jokers? Ok, not an expert on Batman, but his portrayals have been exactly that in the last 30 years…

Chaotic Evil means never having to say you’re sorry.

I go back 50 years, and, yes, there were. During the 50s and 60s especially, he was more of a jokester. No homicidal mania once Frederick Wertham came along, and I think most portrayals of him prior to that made him more diabolical than psychopathic: when he killed, it was usually part of some plan (he would have gotten away with it, too, if it wasn’t for that meddling Batman).

Goldman Sachs? :smiley:

I posted about this a long time ago, I think psychopaths make for boring characters, because their evil stems from a pathology. There is no “there” there, they are missing an essential element of humanity. It is very good fodder for lazy writers. I’m thinking of all the villains of the weeks in series like CSI and L&O and all the others, who do horrible things so detectives will have work to do. They always kill one or two victims early on so the audience knows what kind of jeopardy the final victim, who will be saved, is in. By the numbers, and so boring.

No, that would be Mr Toad. Yeah, I know he wasn’t strictly the protagonist; the book was still dull as ditchwater when he was offscreen.

I know a few psychopaths whose cellmates sure don’t think they’re boring! They’re always hanging on their every word.

I imagine if I were locked in a cage with a psychopath, I’d pay a fair amount of attention to them too!