Brady Campaign gives Obama an 'F' for gun control

Report here (PDF)
Commentary here (NPR)

I’m posting this for a few reasons.

First, when I voted for Barack Obama I said that I was concerned about his positions on gun control, but that was not going to be enough to stop me from voting for him. I asserted that he was going to be too preoccupied with the state of the economy and other things to worry about gun control. I was right.

Second, there was a general hue and cry among a significant number of gun owners that Obama was going to ask for legislation that restricted gun rights. Interestingly, that viewpoint holds even as some more vocal gun owners have (jokingly) declared Obama the NRA Firearms Salesman of the Year due to the huge increases in sales following his election. They were wrong.

Third, a short time into his term his Attorney general, Eric Holder, revived the idea of the Assault Weapons Ban. He has been notably quiet on the subject since, and other than the annual Congressional attempts at gun control bills nobody is talking about it.

Last, in the past year there have been some interesting developments, unexpected things from Obama with regard to guns. He signed the law allowing concealed carry in national parks based upon the laws of the state where the park exists, and he did not attempt to repeal the Tiahrt Amendment like he said he would. Also, the Thune Amendment narrowly failed to pass with a vote of 58-39, although he had nothing to do with that per se.

One other thing, which I have brought up before: McDonald v. Chicago is scheduled to be heard before the Supreme Court, and is likely to result in Incorporation of the 2nd Amendment.

So, does this year’s ambivalence towards gun control indicate that the Democrats and Obama in particular have no interest in pursuing it any longer? History has borne out that it is a loser for the Democrats, but that has not stopped them quite like this before. The Brady campaign has asserted that Obama is in the pocket of the NRA, something that I find to be completely implausible, so I’m writing that off as mere rhetoric.

Or, perhaps, once this health care debacle is over (say what you will, it has indeed been a debacle all around) the Democrats will revisit the subject? If (rather, when) the 2nd Amendment is incorporated, how much can be done in that regard? SCOTUS did not rule out regulation entirely in the Heller decision, but Incorporation might make it harder so it’s surprising that they’re not trying to push some regulations in under the McDonald wire.

The last few parts were mere speculation, just things that I’m putting up for debate in light of the Brady report. For my part, though, I’m not surprised that gun control was ignored this year. Per above, I rather suspected it would be. But the silence on this is deafening. It’s almost as if Obama put a gag order on the subject, and that is totally unexpected. Obama is a busy man, but surely sometime this year he might have addressed the topic, even in passing. I’m rather stunned that he didn’t, and that he so completely ignored the Brady Campaign. I suppose we’ll just have to wait and see.

I have no idea what the administration has in mind. Except for the stimulus, Obama has been amazingly passive as far as getting legislation passed goes. There definitely IS legislation passing (Lily Ledbetter, etc) but I’m not seeing a lot of arm-twisting being done by the White House, especially with anything that generates controversy, like health care. So I don’t know if ignoring gun control is a positive action or just part of the general passive attitude (given that he has quite a bit on his plate already).

They probably just figure it’s not an issue worth wasting political capital on, especially right now when they’re trying to get HCR passed and conservatives are going nuts over anything they perceive as taking their rights away. As you mentioned gun control has proven to be a loser for the Democrats in the past. All it does is give ammunition to the right without garnering them anyone who wouldn’t vote for them anyway. Personally I’m glad that they’ve dropped this issue.

As with many things, I’m unsure of exactly what Obama’s position on this really is…at least from an active, pushing through a program perspective. My feeling is that Obama is mildly for gun control, but that it’s not a priority (and also that he’s smart enough to realize that it’s a losing position for the Dems over all). Probably on par with Bush’s personal feelings about abortion vs his desire to actively push through an initiative on it (and expend the political capital involved in doing so).

Obama has a lot more important stuff on his plate, and I think he’s smart enough to just let this issue go, at least in his first term. Personally, I think it’s unlikely that, even in his second term, he’ll bother touching this subject. What I find amusing is that some of my more fervent ant-gun control friends are STILL buying ammunition and weapons (and paying through the nose for both, since there are all those supply and demand issues involved), or at least they were until recently, and thus far there has been zero evidence that it’s necessary.

-XT

Like Abortion legislation, Gun Control legislation has proven to be too divisive. By this point most politicians know that they’re only scoring points with their base, losing votes with the other side and wasting their time on legislation that ain’t going to pass. Lose lose all around.

I hope that gun control is something that Obama can afford to be more aggressive with in his second term, if he gets one. It’d still be pretty hard to get anything substantial through a congress who have to worry about their own re-elections, though.

I bet there are a lot of Republicans who would agree with you and are hoping that Obama DOES try to push through a more aggressive stance on gun control. Sort of like how the liberals were licking their chops and hoping Bush would push through a more aggressive stance on abortion…

-XT

Actually Obama set a record in terms of getting legislation passed that he took a strong stance on. The highest success rate of any President in history in their first year.

As to the OP. Good, an F is the best grade a President can get on Gun Control.

If the “Brady Bunch” gave him a “F”, then to me Obama did it just right :smiley:

I said all along that Obama didn’t give a shit about gun control, and that the gun owners were getting paranoid about nothing. I am mildly gratified that gun nuts are buying a bunch of useless ammo that’s going to sit and rust in their garages, though. It makes them waste money, if nothing else.

Yeah, so now instead of being rich and happy gun nuts, now they’re broke and pissed. Gun nuts.

Aw hell.

It’s not useless. It doesn’t rust, and it doesn’t go bad.

Why would the president try to push some form of gun control, especially with all the other shit this president has on his plate? The Brady folks should focus on Congress-- you know, the guys who actually pass legislation.

It’s still a waste of money, and what’s it going to be used for?

I don’t know what your politics are, but I agree with you 100 percent on this. If nothing else, it helps disapate the meme that he’s going to take everyone’s guns away.

To shoot, of course. Or to sell, probably at a loss but one can never tell with the price of metals these days. A case of centerfire ammunition goes for quite a premium right now if you can find any.

Shooting at things? Most of us gun nuts occasionally go out and shoot you know. Keeps the guns nice and warm for when we take them to bed later.

There’s been some serious hoarding since the election, huh?

I’m not arguing that. in fact, I totally agree with you. But Obama hasn’t even allowed his surrogates to talk. You can’t tell me that Holder, who clearly did some talking out of school in February, and Emmanuel would not be floating trial balloons left and right if they could, even if there isn’t time right now to directly deal with it.

They do focus on Congress. But Congress didn’t campaign with a strong gun control platform, they have no promises they have to keep.

Obama didn’t really campaign on it, either. I’m sure that, out of the hundreds of Congresscritters, at least some must have put more emphasis on gun control than Obama did, given that in Obama’s campaign, gun control was barely more than a parenthetical in a footnote.