Breaking News in AI

Two stories involving AI deserve comment (outside of being mentioned and ignored in a pit thread). The first is OpenAI coming up with a voice allegedly remarkably similar to Scarlett Johansson after she was twice approached by Altman. The second story are laws that may regulate AI in the European Union, and so may influence other places.

Limited gift links are provided.

I have not heard the voice, and cannot comment in the process actually used to obtain it. Technology always moves faster than regulatory efforts. Yet Europe, for better or worse, seems to be more zealous than other regions in focusing on limits. The question of whether lawmakers are well informed about these issues is a different consideration.

Breaking-er news on the ScarJo angle:

It is fair to say the comments in that article express a degree of skepticism. But I have not heard the voice. This may not matter if the intention was to make a similar voice, as with Bette Midler and a 1980s Ford commercial.

I think the voice in this video (starting around 10 minutes in) is Sky, but it doesn’t explicitly say.

I was so hoping the “different actress” would turn out to be Samantha Morton.

I was hoping it wouldn’t be Fran Drescher.

Excerpt, The Globe, 2nd article in first post

Europe’s landmark rules on artificial intelligence will enter into force next month after EU countries endorsed on Tuesday a political deal reached in December, setting a potential global benchmark for a technology used in business and everyday life.

The European Union’s AI Act is more comprehensive than the United States’ light-touch voluntary compliance approach while China’s approach aims to maintain social stability and state control.

…Concerns about AI contributing to misinformation, fake news and copyrighted material have intensified globally in recent months amid the growing popularity of generative AI systems such as Microsoft-backed OpenAI’s ChatGPT, and Google’s chatbot Gemini.

…“With the AI Act, Europe emphasizes the importance of trust, transparency and accountability when dealing with new technologies while at the same time ensuring this fast-changing technology can flourish and boost European innovation,” [said some suit].

The AI Act imposes strict transparency obligations on high-risk AI systems while such requirements for general-purpose AI models will be lighter.

It restricts governments’ use of real-time biometric surveillance in public spaces to cases of certain crimes, prevention of terrorist attacks and searches for people suspected of the most serious crimes.

The new legislation will have an impact beyond the 27-country bloc… [said some lawyer]….Other countries and regions are likely to use the AI Act as a blueprint, just as they did with the GDPR,” he said, referring to EU privacy rules.

While the new legislation will apply in 2026, bans on the use of artificial intelligence in social scoring, predictive policing and untargeted scraping of facial images from the internet or CCTV footage will kick in six months once the new regulation enters into force.

More on the Her star’s case: Why Can't OpenAI Make ChatGPT Sound Like Scarlett Johansson? - Above the Law

I am confused as to how “strict transparency” can apply to AI, by definition.

Remember the old saying “an apple a day keeps the doctor away”?

Well AI can provide the kinds of health recommendations that so many people have missed who don’t ask questions to the AI sites:

How many rocks should I eat each day?

Daniel Nazer: "This one from Ben Collins over on the bird hell s…" - Mastodon.

Well it turns out people have found the high quality source Google might have used for this result:

Asked “how many rocks should I eat each day,” Overview said that geologists recommend eating “at least one small rock a day.” That language was of course pulled almost word-for-word from a 2021 Onion headline. Another search, “what color highlighters do the CIA use,” prompted Overview to answer “black,” which was an Onion joke from 2005.

That’s hilarious.