There was nothing wrong with my argument. The problem was, as described above, Bricker wanted to say one thing and argue another. The way I called him out is exactly what he has done for years here, often de-railing threads for many posts while he argues about some pedantic minutiae as if this were a court of law and not one of public opinion. It’s the tactic of a cowardly jackass, IMO, because it reeks of his wanting to “win”. He’s constantly focused on it.
IMO tho, the thing that really made him mad was my bringing up the time he flat out lied and was caught red-handed. And once caught, he fled. He ran away rather than take his lumps and admit it. I’ve never read his posts the same way since. He’s not an honest debater. He has an agenda and he will lie, at least, in order to further that agenda. How much further will he take his dishonesty if it furthers his cause?
And yeah, it’s kind of a shame. Bricker is a smart guy and when he’s not being a manipulative jackass, he’s… well, he’s at least not being that.
See ya, Bricker! Always remember: I won!