Dunno how to feel about this. Seems a little late to stop feeding the troll. The guy is a compulsive liar–that’s not an opinion, it is a remarkably verifiable fact, regrettably. Is it unreasonable to expect NEWS outlets to at least try to deliver something that looks like the truth? If so, how much sense does it make to place that seal of approval on what a reasonable person can only expect will be a barrage of lies to terrify the easily deceived and to further a political aim?
On the other hand, something is brewing, and don’t NEWS outlets have an obligation to present the major goings on of society?
Maybe they can broadcast him on a 20 minute delay, so the fact checkers can research what he says and update the scrolling banner beneath his mug as he says what he wants to say? Seems like a fair compromise.