I was under the distinct impression that she got just as much pleasure out of the murders as her hubby. Regardless, she did more than just help a serial killer; she actually took part in the killings. That’s more than just a serial groupy, IMHO.
Amazon Floozy Goddess, your suggestion is disgusting and reprehensible at every level. The most important thing about life imprisonment: you can take it back. With Rader this is really unlikely, but in virtually every case, there is some vague possibility that the sentencing was wrong; that the accused is innocent. Now, it is bad enough that some people are discovered innocent after twenty years in prison, and have to start their life over. It is worse if their dead. It is worst of all if they have been tortured to death. Death is a punishment that (very arguably) no human has the right to carry out on another human being. Torture is a punishment that absolutely no human or even institution has the right to carry out on a human being.
I’m also not sure why the victims should get to decide how to punish the perpetrators of crime. The whole point of trial by jury is impartiality; the family is never impartial, and I often see families going nuts on TV, trying to lash out at whoever is available, regardless of whether or not their target is guilty. In other words, the primary goal of most victims’ families is punishment, not justice. Fine, I wouldn’t expect otherwise. They’re distraught. Punishing a murderer does not bring back his/her victims, and as such, the family of the victim cannot be helped by the death or torture of the murderer. Only time and therapy (and God) can heal the pain.
And in the meantime, Amazon Floozy Goddess wants to do things to these people that I wouldn’t support having done to insects.
Disgusting. Just disgusting.