Maybe people have a hard time reading poor grammar? If your post makes my head hurt trying to comprehend it I will likely skip over it.(anyone remember mr.bunnyhurt?)
Nobody reads posts with poo grammar
Oh, please.
What’s the matter? You didn’t get enough ego strokes from everybody else you feel it necessary to attack me because I wasn’t amused?
At least know who you’re attacking. I am definately not a guy.
Sterra wrote:
As I said in the original post about not reading posts, which I’m guessing you didn’t read, the problem is that people respond to posts they haven’t read. Merely skipping them is not such a high crime, but responding to posts you don’t read just cranks up the noise level for everybody.
Arden Ranger wrote:
That by you was an attack? Hey your shoelaces are untied. See? I never let up with the attacks. How many Arden Rangers does it take to screw in a lightbulb? None, because it’s just not funny. Maybe it’s me.
You got me there. Zing!
Oh.
Woe is me.
I have been struck down by your rapier wit.
However shall I go on?
:rolleyes:
Arden Ranger wrote:
Come on, now. This is just naked sarcasm. I mean, if you had written A Modest Proposal it would read, “Hey, why don’t we eat babies while we’re at it? Yeah, that’d be real good.”
Relax, I’m just giving you the haircut.
But that’s where I’ve gone astray, because this thread is about giving George W. Bush the haircut. But my heart’s not in it. I actually think he’s fairly progressive. Just the other day, he announced he would do away with sin tax. From the way he talked, I think he meant it. That guy doesn’t even know the meaning of prevarication.
Johnny, you had me at “legistration.”
I also happen to agree with what caught my eye in that long post of yours that I skimmed (note to thread participants: we call the preceding “deadpan” ;)). But hey, I’m an MPSIMS ho, so what do I know?
Back to the lovely and talented OP’s lovely and talented OP: This is not surprising, as has been mentioned. As Esprix (also, and this cannot be coincidence, lovely and talented) brought up, the lack of the pseudo-presidential stamp of approval should affect the celebration not a whit. “What if they didn’t officially declare Gay Pride Month and everybody came?” or something.
In a few years, when the entire border of the U.S. is lined with razor wire and the skies are criss-crossed with the contrails of National Missile Defense missiles racing to catch that seagull before it levels New York, we’ll look back on the time Bush didn’t proclaim Gay Pride month with a certain whimsical nostalgia, I think. (Note: the preceding was “hyperbole.”)
Johnny Angel and Arden Ranger: knock it off. Now.
Hmmmm . . . I think I’ve been both complimented and insulted . . . So I’ll consider it a wash.
Eve, I apologize for hijacking? infecting? everything I wrote after my first post.
By whom? Only the former from me, I assure you.