I can be very wrong in this yet I am under the extremely strong impression that you just used two non existing extensions to utterly normal English words.
I also have to bring you the sad but true news that "you ain’t seen nothing yet " when it comes to my extreme well developped skills of rethorical use of a language. English is a very poor one asking a lot of words to get the message across and especially when comparing it to the possibilities offered by Arabic (and then I don’t even touch the possibilities offered by Classical Arabic).
It can be done. What does a nuclear weapon “look like”? Some small US nuclear weapons, like the SADMs, were intentionally made larger and heavier so that they required two people to transport and emplace. The W54 only weighed 51 pounds.
Typically, they’re made out of a futuristic-looking shiny material, often in a vague trunk-like shape. The surface of the material will have grooves and indentations that don’t serve any apparent purpose, and there will always be a mechanism for accessing an inner control panel: typically, you have to push a button or unscrew a highly-polished canister. Inside the control panel is a button, along with a set of LED digit displays for the timer. There are exposed wires connecting all these components–no more then two colors may be used for all the wiring (this is common to all electrically actuated exposives, of course). The detonator may be exposed in that panel, or you may have to unscrew another canister to get to it.
